Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • beeman
    Member
    • May 2012
    • 20

    re-annotating cuffdiff output?

    I have gene_set data from two sources, one from ncbi and one from the honeybee genome consortium (beebase). I performed my cufflinks/cuffmerge/cuffdiff workflow using the ncbi annotations and now I'd like to reannotate the cuffdiff output to see if any of the novel transcripts identified by cufflinks are described in the beebase annotations..

    If it possible to just update the transcript id's instead of running cuffmerge/cuffdiff again?

    Thanks,
  • sdriscoll
    I like code
    • Sep 2009
    • 436

    #2
    why wouldn't you just use cuffcompare to compare your annotation generated from cuffmerge with the one from beebase?
    /* Shawn Driscoll, Gene Expression Laboratory, Pfaff
    Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA */

    Comment

    • beeman
      Member
      • May 2012
      • 20

      #3
      Thanks for the advice, I'll give that a go.

      Comment

      • sdriscoll
        I like code
        • Sep 2009
        • 436

        #4
        I should add that the idea only works if both annotations are relative to the same genome.
        /* Shawn Driscoll, Gene Expression Laboratory, Pfaff
        Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA */

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          Yesterday, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        6 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        19 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        53 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...