Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JER
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2014
    • 4

    Exome sequencing DNA from FFPE tissue

    Does anyone know how well Illumina Hiseq can deal with DNA from FFPE tissue? We have a method to deal with the Cytosines changing to Uracil but is it feasible to use DNA from paraffin for exome sequencing if it hasn't degraded too much? We'd be using the Nextera rapid capture Enrichment Kit ideally.

    Thanks
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    Does anyone know how well Illumina Hiseq can deal with DNA from FFPE tissue?
    HiSeq and other Illumina sequencing systems sequences prepped libraries, so the origin of DNA does not make much difference on sequencer output.

    We have a method to deal with the Cytosines changing to Uracil but is it feasible to use DNA from paraffin for exome sequencing if it hasn't degraded too much? We'd be using the Nextera rapid capture Enrichment Kit ideally.
    The issue would be preparing a suitable input Nextera library (300 bp peak) for hybridisation step from FFPE tissue DNA as Nextera requires high molecular weight input DNA. A high degree of customisation may be necessary to obtain such library. You might be better off with kits that use short DNA fragments from shearing for library prep step.

    Comment

    • Bukowski
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2010
      • 388

      #3
      We've used SureSelect capture on FFPE samples regularly. Works just fine, but basically there is a trade off, if the DNA is highly fragmented you will run into trouble. You can somewhat ameliorate this by throwing more DNA into the hyb, but the bigger the fragments in your sample, the better it will perform.

      We've done exome sequencing on 25 year old FFPE samples. I won't say the data was great, but it worked.

      Comment

      • mellyflow
        Junior Member
        • Jul 2013
        • 1

        #4
        Hi Bukowski, you say with highly-fragmented DNA you will run into trouble. Can you elaborate on this? What sorts of troublesome things have you seen? Increased dupes and varying insert sizes?

        Comment

        • dannydesloover
          Junior Member
          • Nov 2012
          • 5

          #5
          FFPE - qPCR to check X-linking.

          Even if your FFPE DNA is not highly fragmented, you should run some qPCR to check for residual cross-linking via the FFPE process. If doing sureselect or nextera, you'll have a severely less diverse library from FFPE compared to the same amount of non-FFPE DNA.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
          0 responses
          26 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          37 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          34 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...