Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • the_august
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2013
    • 6

    Time required to complete a transcriptom to Genome mapping project

    Hello All,
    I'm a new comer to NGS. However, I have years of experience in other field of Bioinformatics and I'm well
    versed in scripting/programming. Besides, I've experience in general sequence analysis.
    I wish to align raw squence reads of a transcriptome to a already sequence genome of the same organism to look for
    novel transcripts.
    I plan to use TOPHAT. I've access to high performance Linux Cluster at my University. Being a novice I think I'll need some time to learn
    about these tools, stumble on some steps and retry things.

    I wish to know how long it might take for me to complete such a project?

    Thanks
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    The first part won't take long, though it depends on the size of your genome and number of reads. You simply index the genome (one command), then map the reads (another command). Alternately, if you are only interested in novel transcripts, you could map to the transcriptome first, requiring high identity, then only map the remaining unmapped reads to the genome, which will greatly enrich for novel splices and leave you with less data to wade through.

    The analysis will take a lot longer; how long depends on how much you automate it and how big and well-annotated the genome is. There are some tools in the Tuxedo package designed for identifying novel transcripts but I have not found them to work well. I highly recommend IGV, though, for visualizing aligned reads to identify novel splices and transcripts. Incidentally, when mapping RNA-seq data to the genome to look for novel transcripts, I recommend BBMap over Tophat; it's faster and more sensitive.

    Comment

    • the_august
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2013
      • 6

      #3
      Many thanks for your answer. I'll be working with Mouse genome and a particular mouse tissue transcriptome.

      Thanks

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        Since you already have experience with command line/programming it should not take longer then a month to complete the whole project (probably including the time you will need to spend on coming up to speed with things).

        That time estimate is for a modest number of samples (say < 100). If you are going to do thousand(s) then the one month estimate does not apply

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          Yesterday, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        10 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        9 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        16 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        31 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...