Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Risha
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 4

    #16
    I also came across the 'missing header' error. I found that that when converting BAM-> SAM, I had forgotten about printing the headers. This fixed it for me:


    BAM -> SAM:
    Note : -h print header for the SAM output
    Code:
    samtools view -h in.bam > out.sam

    SAM -> BAM (even SAM produced from BWA):

    Code:
    samtools view -bS in.sam > out.bam

    Comment

    • Lovro
      Member
      • Mar 2015
      • 19

      #17
      i have the same problem...

      this is from the man samtools:
      o Import SAM to BAM when @SQ lines are present in the header:

      samtools view -bS aln.sam > aln.bam

      If @SQ lines are absent:

      samtools faidx ref.fa
      samtools view -bt ref.fa.fai aln.sam > aln.bam

      where ref.fa.fai is generated automatically by the faidx command.

      However, i don't know which ref.fa to use.
      The sam i'm trying to convert to bam, sort and index was generated by a foreign seq searching program, readscan, which uses host and pathogen ref seqs and try to map to both of them.

      the actual sam file i'm trying to convert is "ambiguous.sam" which contains reads mapped to both ref seqs.

      can somebody please explain what is going on... what are @SQ lines, why does samtools need them to convert to bam and index the file, why am i expected to provide a ref.fa ....

      its really confusing

      tnx !

      Comment

      • mastal
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2009
        • 666

        #18
        If you are aligning to something like the human genome, then you would usually have one @SQ line for each chromosome in the sam file header.

        If you have the sequences of the host and pathogen the reads were mapped to, you could combine them into a ref.fa file, and run samtools faidx.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        14 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...