Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • adrian
    Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 90

    insert size

    Dear group:
    I need some help in understanding insert size concept.

    I have a targeted exome sequencing data using paired-end approach with 76 bp. I have lots of duplicates in the sam file. I should use rmdup with insert size correctly mentioned.

    i was told by technician that insert size is between 150-300 bp.

    When I see 9th tag which is inferred insert size in sam file, I have lots of numbers that range from 0 to 100,000.

    Since the experiment is done with an insert size 150-300 bp, and BWA inferred insert size has lots of ranges, what number should I use in using rmdup. Heng Li recommends that we should use correct insert size always. If I have range from 150-300 (technician) and SAM file inferred sizes are spanning across wide ranges, Which insert size should I select to remove duplicates and call SNPs.

    OR should I make sets of reads that fall into certain ranges and call SNPs in each bin.

    Also what is inferred insert size '0' mean and what is 345,039 mean.

    thanks
    Adrian
  • krobison
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2007
    • 734

    #2
    Many if not all of the very large insert sizes are probably due to falsely aligned reads to repeats (LINEs, SINEs, Satellite, etc); take a few of them and look to see whether both reads actually align to non-repeat DNA.

    Also, take a sample from your SAM file (ideally random) & look at the size distribution -- you may see a long tail of weird sizes, but you'll probably see most of the counts in a distribution around what the technician said. It's a worthwhile check on the library in any case & easy to generate the data table with a little bit of perl (or even UNIX shell commands).

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    12 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    15 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    20 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    54 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...