Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GW_OK
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 411

    #16
    Originally posted by brjordan View Post
    Thank you all for your helpful feedback.

    One more point: it looks as if 454 has been losing market share. Maybe that's why they just announced a "454 junior" with 1/5th the price and 1/10th the throughput of their current system?
    I heard about the GS Jr. several years ago from a Roche rep (very hush-hush at the time) so I don't think rolling it out is in response to market share. Frankly I thought the project had been shelved until they announced it.

    Comment

    • james hadfield
      Moderator
      Cambridge, UK
      Community Forum
      • Feb 2008
      • 224

      #17
      Our GAs have serial numbers and apprximate installation dates of:
      202 October 2007
      350 May 2008
      582 December 2008

      Comment

      • dan
        wiki wiki
        • Jul 2008
        • 194

        #18
        Have you heard of the 'Tank counting statistic'?




        Assuming sequential serial numbers, you should be able to bound the number of machines 'in the wild'.
        Homepage: Dan Bolser
        MetaBase the database of biological databases.

        Comment

        • nickloman
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2009
          • 355

          #19
          Hi guys

          As part of the high-throughput sequencing map site James Hadfield and I set up, I've added a little page to collect instrument serial numbers.

          Once we've got enough numbers for any given platform I'll post the results on the page. Hopefully we can get enough serials for each platform to get definitive data on the numbers of shipped instruments.

          This is entirely anonymous and I won't publish the serial numbers so you won't upset your instrument rep!

          Go visit http://pathogenomics.bham.ac.uk/hts/serial to take part

          Cheers!

          Nick.

          Comment

          • steven
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2009
            • 269

            #20
            Originally posted by dan View Post
            Have you heard of the 'Tank counting statistic'?




            Assuming sequential serial numbers, you should be able to bound the number of machines 'in the wild'.
            Right. We are assuming here that for instance, none of the companies uses the same series for several kinds of products.
            Tank counting is ok as long as only tanks are numbered..

            Comment

            • nickloman
              Senior Member
              • Jul 2009
              • 355

              #21
              Yep, it does depend on companies not sharing serial numbers between unrelated product lines. Intuitively this feels unlikely to be the case but I guess it is possible.

              We do have some data (e.g. from the map) which will help us figure out if the predictions are likely to be right, e.g. relative frequencies of 454s, Solexas and SOLiDs in the wild.

              My boss always says "Why think, why not do the experiment?" - lets have a go and see if it works! Please send your numbers in!

              Comment

              • avilella
                Member
                • Mar 2009
                • 34

                #22
                Awesome initiative!

                As an incentive to reports, a prize should be given to the person who reported the highest id at the end of each week (Friday 5pm CET). T-shirt? Chocolate bar?

                Originally posted by brjordan View Post
                The number of machines sold by each major manufacturer is a closely guarded secret - they gave some figures at the beginning, but no longer now (as far as I've been able to see). Does anyone have firm or semi-firm estimates? My own guestimate is around 1,000 systems sold altogether, more than half being Illumina and the rest shared (about equally) between 454 and SOLiD...
                Do you agree, disagree?

                All replies will be VERY welcome!

                Comment

                • nickloman
                  Senior Member
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 355

                  #23
                  Hehe! That might skew the results a bit

                  Comment

                  • avilella
                    Member
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 34

                    #24
                    Maybe we then need a phone picture of the Serial number as a proof :-)

                    Originally posted by nickloman View Post
                    Hehe! That might skew the results a bit

                    Comment

                    • james hadfield
                      Moderator
                      Cambridge, UK
                      Community Forum
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 224

                      #25
                      Hi Steven,

                      Almost all manufacutrers use sequential serial numbers, they have too as it is very complex to try and hide this kind of info. Assuming this is tru for ABI, 454 and Illumina then this method should give an approximation. I believe they do not use a set of serial numbers across multiple platforms. Our BeadScanner and Cluster station are quite different to our GAs.

                      The google map (http://pathogenomics.bham.ac.uk/hts) of seqeuncers Nick mentioned might allow us to say if that approximation bears any resemblance to what people say they have on the map.

                      Comment

                      • steven
                        Senior Member
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 269

                        #26
                        Sure, the assumption of sequential serial numbers for a same product line is reasonable and makes sense (although it is still an assumption). As soon as i get my hands on a machine i will definitely post the number.

                        Comment

                        • nickloman
                          Senior Member
                          • Jul 2009
                          • 355

                          #27
                          Guys

                          I've got 15 numbers so far. Mainly these are Illumina, the rest are 454 and only 1 SOLiD number. We probably only need 15 or so more numbers to start making predictions .. Please spread the word far and wide to anyone who can get access to a machine and post a number for this project!



                          Still no prizes on offer yet, just the warm glow of having helped the war effort. But if incentives are required then so be it!!

                          Cheers

                          Comment

                          • james hadfield
                            Moderator
                            Cambridge, UK
                            Community Forum
                            • Feb 2008
                            • 224

                            #28
                            Maybe someone could offer a prize? Illumina, ABI or 454, even Pacific Biosciences perhaps ;-)
                            James.

                            Comment

                            • steven
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 269

                              #29
                              Originally posted by james hadfield View Post
                              Maybe someone could offer a prize? Illumina, ABI or 454, even Pacific Biosciences perhaps ;-)
                              James.
                              They are all too busy changing their serial number policy, setting a +10 iteration at each machine

                              Comment

                              • Joann
                                Senior Member
                                • Oct 2008
                                • 230

                                #30
                                Cookies!

                                I'll send a box of fresh home-baked cookies custom prepared according to the winner's favorite ingredients and specs. Otherwise, chocolate-chip with pecans.
                                Joann

                                Comment

                                Latest Articles

                                Collapse

                                • mylaser
                                  Reply to Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                                  by mylaser
                                  Kheloyar – Everything You Need to Know About Kheloyaar Login and Kheoyar Id
                                  If you are looking for an online gaming platform that offers a user-friendly experience, Kheloyar has become a name that many users search for. Whether you're interested in creating a new account, accessing your dashboard through Kheloyaar Login, or learning how to obtain a Kheoyar Id, understanding the platform's features and account process is essential.
                                  This guide explains everything you need to know about...
                                  Today, 01:13 AM
                                • SEQadmin2
                                  Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                                  by SEQadmin2



                                  Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                                  ...
                                  07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
                                • SEQadmin2
                                  Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                                  by SEQadmin2



                                  Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                                  There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                                  07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

                                ad_right_rmr

                                Collapse

                                News

                                Collapse

                                Topics Statistics Last Post
                                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
                                0 responses
                                16 views
                                0 reactions
                                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
                                0 responses
                                10 views
                                0 reactions
                                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
                                0 responses
                                22 views
                                0 reactions
                                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
                                0 responses
                                31 views
                                0 reactions
                                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                                Working...