Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mlacencio
    Member
    • Oct 2013
    • 13

    How can I distinguish assembly error from true splice or isoforms in RNA-seq?

    Hii everyone!

    I have received thousands of transcripts generated by a non-stranded RNA-seq and I have just annotated them (I used a in-house bash script to extract from blast results xml the most informative and frequent annotations from blast hits). However, I have found that many transcripts have the same annotation, e.g. two transcripts have been annotated as 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase and so on.

    Please find attached a file containing some examples of blast alignments of these transcritps. Would you consider these cases as a result of wrong assembly? How can I distinguish assembly error from true splice or isoforms in RNA-seq? Moreover, can I consider two highly similar reverse complement transcripts as only one single transcripts since this is a non-stranded RNA-seq?

    Best regards,

    Marcio
    Attached Files
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    Many organisms have multiple copies of genes that may be slightly different. I would worry about classifying two sequences with only 89% or 95% identity as the same transcript. Assembly error rates should be far below that.

    But it may depend on the organism... is it haploid or diploid/polyploid?

    Comment

    • GenoMax
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2008
      • 7142

      #3
      Examples you included in your file are good hits over most entire length of those contigs. What method did you use to assemble the contigs? What was the average depth that led to that consensus sequence? Since this is non-stranded library you do have a 50-50 chance of sequencing either strand.

      Comment

      • Brian Bushnell
        Super Moderator
        • Jan 2014
        • 2709

        #4
        I may have misinterpreted something... are the Blast alignments you posted of the transcriptome to itself, or to some other database?

        Comment

        • mlacencio
          Member
          • Oct 2013
          • 13

          #5
          Hi Brian and GenoMax!

          The Blast alignments I posted are of the transcriptome to itself. Anyway, transcripts are from a tetraploid organism.

          GenoMax, the sequences have been assembled by someone else. I will have to check with him how he has assembled the reads.

          Best,

          Marcio

          Comment

          • Brian Bushnell
            Super Moderator
            • Jan 2014
            • 2709

            #6
            If it's tetraploid, then depending on the organism's degree of heterozygosity, those may very well be the same transcript from different ploidies (which would not really be considered misassemblies)... or they could be two copies of the same gene with different genomic coordinates. I don't know that there's an easy way to tell. If possible, I'd try to inbreed the organism as much as possible before doing assemblies.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
              by SEQadmin2


              Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

              The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
              ...
              07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            18 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
            0 responses
            32 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
            0 responses
            43 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            29 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...