Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • luc
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 469

    #1

    poly-G in barcode reads?

    Hi All,

    we have a strange problem - fortunately only with a single truseq library. Two independent Hiseq runs resulted in only about 15% usable (demultiplexable) reads from genomic DNA samples.
    A whopping 35% of the 6bp barcodes were read as "GGGGGG". These and other very G-rich sequences are dominating the barcode reads. These sequences do not match the actually used barcodes (which were 12 balanced truseq barcode sequences - no bias towards certain bases per position and balanced with regard to the samples).
    The quality scores for the barcode reads are poor, as you can imagine, however the forward and reverse reads are fine (and they contain the expected sequences; there is no sign of any external contamination).
    The libraries were generated PCR free and we actually only have barcoded Illumina adpters in the lab (truseq style). This is the first time we ran into this. Nevertheless it would be great to know how to prevent reoccurrences.

    Did anybody ever come across a similar problem or has a potential explanation?

    Thanks a lot in advance!

    (We had the libraries sequenced at a service).
    Last edited by luc; 02-26-2013, 10:32 AM.
  • rogerzzw
    Member
    • Mar 2015
    • 16

    #2
    we had the same problem with 1st run in our lab. Do you have a idea what's going on?

    Appreciate your help

    Comment

    • luc
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 469

      #3
      Sorry, we never figured out what went wrong. Clearly there was a problem with the library prep (two sequencing runs yielded the same type of unusable barcode data). The postdoc re-made the libraries (using the same protocol - standard genomic DNA library prep using NEB and Enzymatics enzymes; Bioo adapters) and the results where problem-free.

      Comment

      • rogerzzw
        Member
        • Mar 2015
        • 16

        #4
        Thanks, luc.

        What we did is pooling several different libraries (made by two persons) together to get sequence. It turned out about 30% of reads did not match any of the barcodes used in library prep. 6bp G accounts for a fair amount of reads that did not get recognized.

        It looks more difficult here because you probably do not know who made it run. Maybe we can try to align the reference genome ( one person use human sample, the other use mouse sample), to see where it belongs to. So that maybe we can know.

        Thanks!

        Comment

        • GenoMax
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2008
          • 7142

          #5
          Have either of you talked with illumina tech support about this? What was their take?

          Comment

          • rogerzzw
            Member
            • Mar 2015
            • 16

            #6
            Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
            Have either of you talked with illumina tech support about this? What was their take?
            Have not yet.

            I used kit that not come from illumina.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
            0 responses
            27 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
            0 responses
            20 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
            0 responses
            38 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            44 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...