Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rwmills
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2015
    • 2

    bcftools doesn't call suspected indel

    Hello-

    I am looking for CRISPR-mediated indels using samtools/bcftools 1.2, but bcftools call doesn't report an apparent indel.

    If I use this command:
    samtools mpileup -guf ref.fasta sortedReads.bam | bcftools call -c - > out.vcf

    and inspect the output vcf, I find in the expected indel location that only ref exists:

    Code:
    Human	3078	.	A	.	283.236	.	DP=574;VDB=0.00187095;SGB=-0.590765;RPB=0.623577;MQB=0.639386;BQB=0.0765187;MQ0F=0;AF1=0;AC1=0;DP4=531,0,5,0;MQ=40;FQ=-281.989;PV4=1,0.0104987,1,1	GT:PL	0/0:0
    Human	3079	.	A	.	283.236	.	DP=578;VDB=0.958818;SGB=-0.616816;RPB=0.337168;MQB=0.757481;BQB=0.00621451;MQ0F=0;AF1=0;AC1=0;DP4=524,0,6,0;MQ=40;FQ=-281.989;PV4=1,4.05418e-05,1,2.10095e-14	GT:PL	0/0:0

    However, if I backup a step and use
    samtools mpileup -f ref.fasta sortedReads.bam > out.pileup

    and inspect the output pileup file I find the below, which I believe indicates that site 3078 is reference, but 3079 has a 3bp indel. If so, what options should I pass to the caller to report these indels when I setup my pipeline (I don't want to manually inspect every pileup!)?

    Code:
    Human	3078	A	537	*............................................................................................G......................+3ATT..................................................................................+3ATT................................................................................+3TTT..+3TTTCGGG............................................................................................................+3ATT...............+3ATT..................................................................................................................................	HHHHE?H;GGAHHE>ECF/FHC/GHHHHHGHAHHHHHHF/FHHH/H/HHHEHEHHHHHGHHHGCHHG?HHHHHH?HHHHHHGGHHHHGFHHHEEGH0FEAHHGG>HHHHHHHAGE/?GHHHHHHF/<67HHHHHHHGEHHHG/HHHHHHH/>HCHHHGHHHGH>HHHHGFHHAGGHHHHEH//H9H9HFGHCHH/GH:BHHFG/CEGG/?/:F>EFFFEHH/FHHGFGG/GH/HFHHHHH/HGEHHHHHGHHHHHHHHGGHH//G?CFEFFHHH9<85;=/GG3H?E3HBH?HGFHFH/GHG?HGHGHHFCHHH/HHECHFEHHHHEHHGHHFA/GEFFAH/EHHH/HHHEEGGFAGH/EHF/HHHHHGHEGGHH?HEH//GHHG?HFFHH:GHFGGHFH/EHHGH:HGF/FHHHHHHHGHGEHGCHFHHHEHH/HHHHHHHHHHHGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHFHHHHHHHHHHHHHAHGHHHHHHHHHFHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHGHHGHHHHGHGHHGHC03B4
    Human	3079	A	531	*.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TCG...+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG...+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TCG.+3TTG...+3TTG.+3TTG....+3TTG.+3TTG...+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG...+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TCG.+3TTG.+3TTG...+3TTG.....+3TTG.+3TTG....+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TTG...+3TTG.+3TTG.......+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG...+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TTG...+3TTG...+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG...+3TTG...+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TTG.+3ATG.+3ATG..............+3CTG.+3CTG.............................-5CACAT....+3GTG...+3TAG.+3TAG..+3TCG.+3TCG..+3TCG...+3TGG..+3TGG....+3TGG.+2TG....+3TTC.+3TTC..+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTTGG+3TTGT+3TTG.+3TTG...+3TTG..+3TGG.+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG...+3TTG.+3TTG....+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TTG.....+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TTG...+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TTG....+3TTG.+3TTG.....+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TTG...+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TTG...+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TAG.+3TTG.......+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TTG...+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG...+3TTG.....+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TGG.+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TCG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TTG..+3TTG...+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TCG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TTG...+3TCG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG....+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.-5CACAT.+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG.+3TTG..+3TTGCC.+3TTGC	HH;;/H/FH9/E//E/AFEHF;6HHHHG/HGHHHHHHGBGHHH?;GHEEEHHHGHHHHHHHH;HEHGEHHHHH/HHHHHHG/HHFF//CHG///G?EE9HHHG;HHHHHHHEH/F/HHH=HG/2G723HHHHEHH/EHHHA>H>EEFHH/EH>HHHHHHHCH/GHHHEEHH2///;/H46/=H6H6/D/;FCCB;52/G//5;5/9=//75=99///>D/HHEGHH>HE/H>HHHHH6HEAHHEHH6HHH6HHHHE/=6C/G8/D9//F;;901/GG3G8?GH;H9HH9GEHF=HH/HHHFHG=FHHH/HHF/H5/HGFHHHHHHH:AC/FFFEH/?HHH?HH;6HHHEEH/64HH//HHFHHEH/HHGFF;HEC4;;H6=HEEHHHHFEE;GH>FH;GH;;//CAHHH;HH/HEA;G?C;HG;HHD/;:E;H;;;;;;;;;;;=;;;;;;;;;;;<;;;;;;H=<;;;;;;H;;;;;2;;2;;;<;;=;;>;;;<;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;H<;<;;<G;10:1
    Last edited by Brian Bushnell; 04-13-2015, 01:54 PM. Reason: added code tags
  • Richard Haigh
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2015
    • 2

    #2
    Hi rwmills

    I am having similar problems with bcftools call - I am using old test data which I know contains 60 snps and 5 indels and Varscan has no problem identifying indels from the data but bcftools will only see the snps whatever modifiers I add to the command. Did you ever resolve this?

    Richard

    Comment

    • rwmills
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2015
      • 2

      #3
      Originally posted by Richard Haigh View Post
      Hi rwmills

      I am having similar problems with bcftools call - I am using old test data which I know contains 60 snps and 5 indels and Varscan has no problem identifying indels from the data but bcftools will only see the snps whatever modifiers I add to the command. Did you ever resolve this?

      Richard
      Hi Richard-

      I was never able to get bcftools to make this call even with substantial data grooming before passing to the caller. In my case, it is likely due to the algorithm being confounded by extreme read depth (>8000), as VarScan's overview mentions. VarScan easily calls this insertion as well as a deletion I hadn't noticed before.

      Comment

      • Richard Haigh
        Junior Member
        • Sep 2015
        • 2

        #4
        Hi Richard-

        I was never able to get bcftools to make this call even with substantial data grooming before passing to the caller. In my case, it is likely due to the algorithm being confounded by extreme read depth (>8000), as VarScan's overview mentions. VarScan easily calls this insertion as well as a deletion I hadn't noticed before.
        Thanks for the reply. I have also tried with data with various read depths and all no good - I'm starting to think that the samtools 1.2 version of bcftools call is just broken for indels. In the end I gave up and have managed to bodge my pipeline using the newer version of Varscan (3.2.9) which gives all the right indels but now has a more acceptable vcf output. A simple bit of editing with awk and the files went into snpEff with no problem.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
          by SEQadmin2


          Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

          The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
          ...
          Today, 11:48 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        8 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
        0 responses
        30 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        39 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...