Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dario1984
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 166

    #16
    Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
    Isaac (http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals...ent/29/16/2041) was possibly designed for human data but should be usable for other genomes. Illumina has released pre-built indexes only for Hg19 but indexes can be built for other genomes (I have not tried it yet). Isaac aligner in HAS uses 32-mer seeds.
    Another PhD student discovered it doesn't work for the sheep genome, which has | in the name of chromosomes.

    e.g.

    >gi|406684590|gb|CM001582.1| Ovis aries breed Texel chromosome 1, whole genome shotgun sequence
    ATGGGGACATGACCGGGAGGTGGGCAAGGAGAGCGTCTACAGCTCAGGGGAGCCAGGGATCACCGCTCCC ...

    I don't see the point of variant calling for a draft genome, though.

    Comment

    • colindaven
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2008
      • 417

      #17
      So is anyone using Phi in bioinformatics these days ? We do have a great number of compute bound processes (blastx, blastx) in a productive pipeline which could be sped up.

      I do wonder about the utility for typical IO and memory bound bioinformatics applications such as NGS though.

      Comment

      • westerman
        Rick Westerman
        • Jun 2008
        • 1104

        #18
        Originally posted by colindaven View Post
        So is anyone using Phi in bioinformatics these days ? We do have a great number of compute bound processes (blastx, blastx) in a productive pipeline which could be sped up.

        I do wonder about the utility for typical IO and memory bound bioinformatics applications such as NGS though.
        I haven't found a good use for the Phi co-processor. As you imply -- IO and memory bound problems are not a good match.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        14 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...