Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rjoyons
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 4

    Using MetaVelvet, what hardware requirements?

    Hi everyone,

    I just received my very first set of shotgun-metagenomic sequencing results. They are illumina pair ended reads produced using the 2x250bp method. I have 26.5 million reads.

    My question is about the memory requirements of metavelvet.. In the manual it says the program requires "At least 12Gb of RAM (more is no luxury)" But they go onto use a computer with 48Gb of RAM to produce their example data in table 1 and the "required memory" for each assembly in tabel 1 is up to 72Gb.

    I'm finding this quite confusing! What happens when the memory requirement exceeds the amount of RAM on the workstation? Will the program crash or start making temporary files on the hard drive? Can you really use a computer with only 12Gb of RAM?

    Any advice would be greatly appreciated!! Please help!
  • student-t
    Member
    • Mar 2015
    • 16

    #2
    The approximate memory requirement is: number of nodes * 416 bytes because 416 bytes is the memory required for a node data-structure in C.

    Comment

    • bastianwur
      Member
      • Feb 2014
      • 98

      #3
      Originally posted by rjoyons View Post
      HWhat happens when the memory requirement exceeds the amount of RAM on the workstation? Will the program crash or start making temporary files on the hard drive?
      Default behaviour: First it'll use the swap, and if the swap gets nearly full, then the kernel will kill the program.

      Do you really have only 12 GB available?

      Apparently the Megahit assembler is really memory efficient, you might want to try that one.

      Comment

      • student-t
        Member
        • Mar 2015
        • 16

        #4
        This is also known as virtual memory, where the hard-disk space is being used for paging.

        Comment

        • Brian Bushnell
          Super Moderator
          • Jan 2014
          • 2709

          #5
          I'm hoping this project has been assembled by now. That said, Megahit is indeed quite efficient and we are now using it for metagenomes, with better results than Soap using a small fraction of the time and memory.

          If you run out of memory with assemblies, particularly metagenomes, it can be helpful to quality-trim, error-correct, and normalize the data first. This can greatly decrease the resource requirements (both time and memory) by reducing the volume of input reads and unique input kmers.

          Comment

          • student-t
            Member
            • Mar 2015
            • 16

            #6
            Brian, do know any paper that reviews it? I'm interested in knowing more.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
            0 responses
            23 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
            0 responses
            33 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            20 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            34 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...