Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • psax
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 3

    Nextseq 500 amplicon length considerations?

    Hi guys,
    I'm planning a bacterial 16s rRNA amplicon sequencing project using Nextseq 500 with 300-cycles reagents. Now I'm trying to figure out how to choose an amplicon size and what the best run type is (single or paired end? If the latter, should the two paired end reads partially overlap?). Are there any basic "rules" or reliable primer sets available? Any suggestions/references would be appreciated.
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    It's best to run paired-end 2x150 with overlapping reads (design for at least 30bp overlap). This will greatly limit your set of available regions; if at all possible, I'd suggest 2x250 or 2x300 on a MiSeq.

    Comment

    • psax
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2011
      • 3

      #3
      Originally posted by Brian Bushnell View Post
      It's best to run paired-end 2x150 with overlapping reads (design for at least 30bp overlap). This will greatly limit your set of available regions; if at all possible, I'd suggest 2x250 or 2x300 on a MiSeq.
      Thank you Brian. I will start from there

      Comment

      • bilyl
        Member
        • Aug 2013
        • 52

        #4
        Originally posted by psax View Post
        Hi guys,
        I'm planning a bacterial 16s rRNA amplicon sequencing project using Nextseq 500 with 300-cycles reagents. Now I'm trying to figure out how to choose an amplicon size and what the best run type is (single or paired end? If the latter, should the two paired end reads partially overlap?). Are there any basic "rules" or reliable primer sets available? Any suggestions/references would be appreciated.
        Commerically available V4 kits play well with 2x150. You could do a V1-V2 amplicon but you'll need longer reads to do that.

        As for the NextSeq, you'll have a really bad time unless you can base stagger your amplicons when you multiplex. Even with a healthy dose of PhiX you'll get poor quality as compared to the MiSeq. I suggest you read up on the primers used and homebrew your own kit.

        Comment

        • Brian Bushnell
          Super Moderator
          • Jan 2014
          • 2709

          #5
          Furthermore, NextSeq has way more capacity than is needed for a 16s study, and currently has major problems with multiplexing; and the 4 "lanes" are not separated. So even if it supported longer reads, I would not recommend it for this purpose.

          Comment

          • psax
            Junior Member
            • Jan 2011
            • 3

            #6
            Originally posted by bilyl View Post
            Commerically available V4 kits play well with 2x150. You could do a V1-V2 amplicon but you'll need longer reads to do that.

            As for the NextSeq, you'll have a really bad time unless you can base stagger your amplicons when you multiplex. Even with a healthy dose of PhiX you'll get poor quality as compared to the MiSeq. I suggest you read up on the primers used and homebrew your own kit.
            Thank you for your advices. With base stagger, do I still have to add 30-50% PhiX?

            Comment

            • fanli
              Senior Member
              • Jul 2014
              • 197

              #7
              I think you'll find more than a few posts recommending that you NOT use NextSeq for amplicon sequencing, even with PhiX. It simply doesn't work as well as MiSeq.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by SEQadmin2


                I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
                by SEQadmin2


                Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


                The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
                ...
                06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 05:37 AM
              0 responses
              6 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
              0 responses
              16 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
              0 responses
              51 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
              0 responses
              110 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...