Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bio_informatics
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2013
    • 182

    #1

    SPAdes: with different read length

    Hi members,

    I'm facing something weird. I know not all reads in the fastq files can have same length.
    But in my trimmed data, read length of reverse and forward files are different. I checked out for only first read, though.

    Data: paired end
    Organism: E. coli

    Output 101 from reverse strand:

    Code:
    zcat sample_R2_trimmed.fastq.gz | awk '{if(NR%4==2) print length($1)}'  | head -1
    Output 54 from forward strand:

    Code:
    zcat sample_R1_trimmed.fastq.gz | awk '{if(NR%4==2) print length($1)}'  | head -1
    An icing to this dilemma is, SPAdes uses 55 as K-mer during assembly. And the genome size from assembly is reasonable.

    My questions:

    1) Shouldn't SPAdes select K-mer less than 55 here?
    Bioinformaticscally calm
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    Can you tell us why are they different (and uniformly of length 54 for R1)? Did you trim them that way?

    Comment

    • bio_informatics
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2013
      • 182

      #3
      Hi Genomax,
      Thanks for your reply.

      I've 2 sets of data, trimmed (sequencing center did this trimming based on the quality)and untrimmed. I used the already trimmed data for assembly.

      Oh, they aren't uniform ( looking at already trimmed file).
      Have 72 different lengths: max is 101, minimum 30.
      So, in a way, all numbers from 30-101 are present for read lengths. That's strange. :-/
      Last edited by bio_informatics; 06-10-2015, 07:50 AM.
      Bioinformaticscally calm

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        In that case your original question is no longer applicable, correct?

        Comment

        • bio_informatics
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2013
          • 182

          #5
          Yes.
          Sorry.

          Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
          In that case your original question is no longer applicable, correct?
          Bioinformaticscally calm

          Comment

          • GenoMax
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2008
            • 7142

            #6
            No problem. Sounds like you did get a reasonable sized assembly so all should be well.

            Comment

            • bio_informatics
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2013
              • 182

              #7
              Yes, that is more important.
              Merci!
              Bioinformaticscally calm

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                by SEQadmin2


                Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                ...
                09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
              0 responses
              17 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
              0 responses
              18 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
              0 responses
              36 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
              0 responses
              42 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...