Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bio_informatics
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2013
    • 182

    SPAdes: with different read length

    Hi members,

    I'm facing something weird. I know not all reads in the fastq files can have same length.
    But in my trimmed data, read length of reverse and forward files are different. I checked out for only first read, though.

    Data: paired end
    Organism: E. coli

    Output 101 from reverse strand:

    Code:
    zcat sample_R2_trimmed.fastq.gz | awk '{if(NR%4==2) print length($1)}'  | head -1
    Output 54 from forward strand:

    Code:
    zcat sample_R1_trimmed.fastq.gz | awk '{if(NR%4==2) print length($1)}'  | head -1
    An icing to this dilemma is, SPAdes uses 55 as K-mer during assembly. And the genome size from assembly is reasonable.

    My questions:

    1) Shouldn't SPAdes select K-mer less than 55 here?
    Bioinformaticscally calm
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    Can you tell us why are they different (and uniformly of length 54 for R1)? Did you trim them that way?

    Comment

    • bio_informatics
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2013
      • 182

      #3
      Hi Genomax,
      Thanks for your reply.

      I've 2 sets of data, trimmed (sequencing center did this trimming based on the quality)and untrimmed. I used the already trimmed data for assembly.

      Oh, they aren't uniform ( looking at already trimmed file).
      Have 72 different lengths: max is 101, minimum 30.
      So, in a way, all numbers from 30-101 are present for read lengths. That's strange. :-/
      Last edited by bio_informatics; 06-10-2015, 07:50 AM.
      Bioinformaticscally calm

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        In that case your original question is no longer applicable, correct?

        Comment

        • bio_informatics
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2013
          • 182

          #5
          Yes.
          Sorry.

          Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
          In that case your original question is no longer applicable, correct?
          Bioinformaticscally calm

          Comment

          • GenoMax
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2008
            • 7142

            #6
            No problem. Sounds like you did get a reasonable sized assembly so all should be well.

            Comment

            • bio_informatics
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2013
              • 182

              #7
              Yes, that is more important.
              Merci!
              Bioinformaticscally calm

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                by SEQadmin2



                Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                ...
                07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                by SEQadmin2



                Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
              • GATTACAT
                Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by GATTACAT
                Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:26 AM
              0 responses
              11 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
              0 responses
              25 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
              0 responses
              16 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
              0 responses
              33 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...