Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mfahim
    Member
    • Apr 2015
    • 11

    Problems with q-value in RNAseq

    I have four subjects (one wildtype and three mutants, no replications) at two different conditions (a total of 8 samples).. cuffdiff tells me there is no significant difference based on adjusted p-value (aka q-value).

    This is why I guess q-value is just overrated.. and is not applicable to every RNAseq analysis.

    What do you say?. I have attached expression bar plot to this post and would appreciate your comments on statistics.
    Attached Files
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    FYI, an adjusted p-value and a q-value aren't actually the same thing, though they're related.

    I have no clue how you came to the conclusion that this somehow indicates that adjusted p-values are overrated. This is a good example of how high variance in an under-powered experiment leads to insignificant results. Adjusted p-values have nothing to do with that.

    Compensating for multiple corrections is applicable to EVERY RNAseq analysis like yours.

    Comment

    • mfahim
      Member
      • Apr 2015
      • 11

      #3
      I got an excellent explanation to my querry..

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
        by SEQadmin2



        Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
        ...
        07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
        by SEQadmin2



        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
        07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:26 AM
      0 responses
      13 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
      0 responses
      26 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
      0 responses
      16 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      33 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...