Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pmiguel
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 2328

    MiSeq bright spots in "C" images only.

    MiSeq run clustered at low density (~450 K/mm2).
    After 8 cycles, panel one looks normal:



    But at cycle 10 a bright spot appears in the "C" image only:

    It persists through later cycles.


    Then at cycle 59 an additional bright spot appears. Again only in the "C" images:

    It also persists through later cycles. Including through the index and second read.

    What are those? I see them in another panel (different position in the panel) as well. Same size.

    --
    Phillip
  • aleferna
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 121

    #2
    Any progress on these I'm getting the same problem?

    Comment

    • aleferna
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2009
      • 121

      #3
      Even more so I'm getting these weird effects
      Attached Files

      Comment

      • ECO
        --Site Admin--
        • Oct 2007
        • 1360

        #4
        Aleferna: your problem looks dramatically different to me (on my phone ha!), more of a complete lack of clusters (or lack of signal in that channel due to a low complexity library or adapter dimer, etc). Do all 4 channels look the same?

        Comment

        • pmiguel
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2008
          • 2328

          #5
          No. Actually the run was overall pretty good, so I guess I forgot to report this issue to Illumina. Yours looks much worse. You definitely want to report it to Illumina tech support.

          Let us know what the diagnosis is...

          --
          Phillip

          Comment

          • pmiguel
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2008
            • 2328

            #6
            Originally posted by ECO View Post
            Aleferna: your problem looks dramatically different to me (on my phone ha!), more of a complete lack of clusters (or lack of signal in that channel due to a low complexity library or adapter dimer, etc). Do all 4 channels look the same?
            I just assumed the images Aleferna posted were much lower resolution. But maybe that is something completely different...

            --
            Phillip

            Comment

            • aleferna
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2009
              • 121

              #7
              Yeap, I've been looking at the raw files and I see these "blobs" / "flares" all the time, where do they come from?

              On the other hand, I think we could be having a problem with adapter dimers, we didn't have any problems with the original nextera, but these Nextera XT is giving us problems. I'm waiting for the response from techsupport but I wanted to get a second opinion in the mean while.

              Why would primer dimers cause these diming problems, we're having problems getting rid of these? Basically we're having lots of problems with the quality of the second read, the first one is sort of ok (not as good as the PhiX though), it looks as if we are loosing signal intensity too fast, could primer dimers cause this?

              Pardon my ignorance its just our second run... I had never seen these images before.
              Last edited by aleferna; 07-10-2012, 11:08 AM.

              Comment

              • pmiguel
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2008
                • 2328

                #8
                Not sure what causes the bright circles.

                If you want our opinion on primer dimers, I think we need to see some bioanalyzer images.

                About the losing signal intensity, that sounds like a fluidics issue--to which MiSeqs are prone. But the MiSeq does have a good diagnostic utility with tests of various sub-systems. If you give tech support a call they can walk you through it.

                --
                Phillip

                Comment

                • Richard Finney
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 701

                  #9
                  I'm curious.
                  Are the blobs detected and then 1) filtered out ... OR .. 2) tagged as bad quality ?

                  These images remind me of the blobs found in microarrays ...




                  ""
                  MICROARRAY Blobs (not nextgen)

                  Comment

                  • aleferna
                    Senior Member
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 121

                    #10
                    well even if they are flitered out, it will introduce a heck of a lot of N's in a large number of reads, not sure how big that pic is but the blob is on top of a lot of clusters. Why only C, well I do have these "flares" or "bubbles" (I hope they're not air bubbles) in a few cases in the A track but nothing in the G or T???

                    Comment

                    • mukeshwar
                      Junior Member
                      • Apr 2013
                      • 4

                      #11
                      Hello Everyone,

                      I am also facing the same problem specifically in channel "C". Did you guys get any answers from Tech Support.

                      Comment

                      • pmiguel
                        Senior Member
                        • Aug 2008
                        • 2328

                        #12
                        I don't think I ever talked to tech support about these. If you do, please post what they say.
                        --
                        Phillip

                        Comment

                        • bunce
                          Member
                          • Sep 2012
                          • 55

                          #13
                          Hi All,
                          I have seen this only once in 100 MiSeq runs - I was told... " xxxx asked me to get in touch with you regarding washing the MiSeq after bright spots have been seen. We don't have a documented workflow as it is just a maintenance wash performed with warm water only. This does a really good job of clearing the lines of any crystals etc.

                          Please let us know if you do continue to see bright spots on your next run, please bear in mind that an occasional spot isn't unusual and shouldn't have much impact on the data."


                          So I think this is some kind of blockage - we did a warm water wash (as suggested) and have not seen it since. Even the run with the 'hot spot' seemed fine.

                          Hope this helps?, Cheers Mike

                          Comment

                          Latest Articles

                          Collapse

                          • SEQadmin2
                            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                            by SEQadmin2



                            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                            ...
                            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
                          • SEQadmin2
                            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                            by SEQadmin2



                            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                            07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
                          • GATTACAT
                            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                            by GATTACAT
                            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

                          ad_right_rmr

                          Collapse

                          News

                          Collapse

                          Topics Statistics Last Post
                          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
                          0 responses
                          23 views
                          0 reactions
                          Last Post SEQadmin2  
                          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
                          0 responses
                          33 views
                          0 reactions
                          Last Post SEQadmin2  
                          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
                          0 responses
                          20 views
                          0 reactions
                          Last Post SEQadmin2  
                          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
                          0 responses
                          34 views
                          0 reactions
                          Last Post SEQadmin2  
                          Working...