Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • psax
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 3

    #1

    Nextseq 500 amplicon length considerations?

    Hi guys,
    I'm planning a bacterial 16s rRNA amplicon sequencing project using Nextseq 500 with 300-cycles reagents. Now I'm trying to figure out how to choose an amplicon size and what the best run type is (single or paired end? If the latter, should the two paired end reads partially overlap?). Are there any basic "rules" or reliable primer sets available? Any suggestions/references would be appreciated.
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    It's best to run paired-end 2x150 with overlapping reads (design for at least 30bp overlap). This will greatly limit your set of available regions; if at all possible, I'd suggest 2x250 or 2x300 on a MiSeq.

    Comment

    • psax
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2011
      • 3

      #3
      Originally posted by Brian Bushnell View Post
      It's best to run paired-end 2x150 with overlapping reads (design for at least 30bp overlap). This will greatly limit your set of available regions; if at all possible, I'd suggest 2x250 or 2x300 on a MiSeq.
      Thank you Brian. I will start from there

      Comment

      • bilyl
        Member
        • Aug 2013
        • 52

        #4
        Originally posted by psax View Post
        Hi guys,
        I'm planning a bacterial 16s rRNA amplicon sequencing project using Nextseq 500 with 300-cycles reagents. Now I'm trying to figure out how to choose an amplicon size and what the best run type is (single or paired end? If the latter, should the two paired end reads partially overlap?). Are there any basic "rules" or reliable primer sets available? Any suggestions/references would be appreciated.
        Commerically available V4 kits play well with 2x150. You could do a V1-V2 amplicon but you'll need longer reads to do that.

        As for the NextSeq, you'll have a really bad time unless you can base stagger your amplicons when you multiplex. Even with a healthy dose of PhiX you'll get poor quality as compared to the MiSeq. I suggest you read up on the primers used and homebrew your own kit.

        Comment

        • Brian Bushnell
          Super Moderator
          • Jan 2014
          • 2709

          #5
          Furthermore, NextSeq has way more capacity than is needed for a 16s study, and currently has major problems with multiplexing; and the 4 "lanes" are not separated. So even if it supported longer reads, I would not recommend it for this purpose.

          Comment

          • psax
            Junior Member
            • Jan 2011
            • 3

            #6
            Originally posted by bilyl View Post
            Commerically available V4 kits play well with 2x150. You could do a V1-V2 amplicon but you'll need longer reads to do that.

            As for the NextSeq, you'll have a really bad time unless you can base stagger your amplicons when you multiplex. Even with a healthy dose of PhiX you'll get poor quality as compared to the MiSeq. I suggest you read up on the primers used and homebrew your own kit.
            Thank you for your advices. With base stagger, do I still have to add 30-50% PhiX?

            Comment

            • fanli
              Senior Member
              • Jul 2014
              • 197

              #7
              I think you'll find more than a few posts recommending that you NOT use NextSeq for amplicon sequencing, even with PhiX. It simply doesn't work as well as MiSeq.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
                by SEQadmin2



                CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

                Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
                ...
                07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                by SEQadmin2


                Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                ...
                07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 08-11-2026, 10:35 AM
              0 responses
              11 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
              0 responses
              29 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
              0 responses
              48 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
              0 responses
              48 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...