Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PatrickV
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2015
    • 2

    PacBio Amplicon reads assembly

    I've got a question regarding the assembly of PacBio reads. We've created a library of approximately 5000 different amplicons between 1 and 3kb and successfully ran these on a couple of flow cells. Next we've ran the RS_ReadsOfInsert protocol and demultiplexed the data with the corresponding barcodes.
    The next step is to align/assemble these reads to each other to build contigs of multiple reads mapping to the same consensus. However the majority of the tools (HGAP, Quiver) that I come across are designed to do (de novo) genome assembly, that is not what we are aiming at, we "just" want to align/assemble the PacBio demultiplexed reads and build contigs from 1-3 kb.
    What tool would be the best to perform this job?
  • rhall
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2012
    • 324

    #2
    I'm not sure I understand, are the 1-3kb amplicons tiled, and you are trying to assemble a longer sequence? Otherwise, using the quality filter in the reads_of_insert protocol you can generate 99.9 accurate amplicons, or are you trying to cluster the amplicon sequences?

    Comment

    • PatrickV
      Junior Member
      • Jun 2015
      • 2

      #3
      Originally posted by rhall View Post
      I'm not sure I understand, are the 1-3kb amplicons tiled, and you are trying to assemble a longer sequence? Otherwise, using the quality filter in the reads_of_insert protocol you can generate 99.9 accurate amplicons, or are you trying to cluster the amplicon sequences?
      No the amplicons are not tiled. After the generation of the reads I indeed would like to cluster the same amplicon sequences together.

      Comment

      • Brian Bushnell
        Super Moderator
        • Jan 2014
        • 2709

        #4
        I wrote a tool for clustering PacBio reads of insert. It does not generate a consensus, but it will output the single highest-quality read per cluster... or, you can generate a consensus from the clusters, if you have a good consensus-generation tool. For my application, the single best read was much better than the consensus, which tended to be chimeric.

        Syntax:

        dedupe.sh in=ros.fq csf=stats.txt outbest=best.fq qin=33 am=f ac=f fo c rnc=f mcs=2 k=27 mo=1400 cc pto nam=4 e=26 pattern=cluster_%.fq

        I've found those specific settings to be extremely good for 16s sequences which are ~1500bp long. But if you have variable size amplicons, you may need to first bin them by size and use a different "mo" (min overlap) and "e" (max edit distance) setting for the individual bins.

        Dedupe is part of the BBTools package.

        Comment

        • rhall
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2012
          • 324

          #5
          To generate a consensus, I would use something like Brian's clustering tool above (usearch, and CDHit are other options) then generate a reference from the best cluster representatives and use it in a quiver resequencing job. This approach works best if the diversity is limited, and clusters represent the same sequence and not closely related sequences, in which case, as is pointed out above, a representative single molecule consensus (at ~QV30) may be more useful than a heterogeneous multi-molecule quiver consensus.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
          0 responses
          24 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          34 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          34 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...