Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • David [R]
    Member
    • Jul 2012
    • 12

    edgeR, "DGELIst" function, "group" parameter

    Hi,

    I am using edgeR for some RNASeq analysis. My question concerns the DGEList function and its "group" parameter. I realized that, whether doing group=mydesignfactor or group=rep(1,ncol(counts)), the cpm numbers that I get after
    counts.TMM <- calcNormFactors(counts.DGEList)
    cpm.TMM=cpm(counts.TMM, normalized.lib.sizes=TRUE)
    are strictly identical in either case. The only difference between both ways is that the counts.TMM$samples$group column duly reflects what I put in in "group".

    Is this normal? What is it that I am missing? Is the "group" nevertheless taken into account on the subsequent estimateGLMCommonDisp, estimateGLMTrendDisp, estimateGLMTagDisp, glmFit, glmLRT etc.?

    Thanks in advance for your help.

    Best,

    David Rengel
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    There's no reason that cpm should be dependent upon your experimental design (in fact, it shouldn't be). The various GLM function pay attention to the design, since that's where it's important.

    Comment

    • David [R]
      Member
      • Jul 2012
      • 12

      #3
      Hi dpryan,

      THanks for your reply. Yes, that is right. My only only doubt came from de fact that if normalized.lib.sizes=TRUE, then the cpm are calculated using the normalization factors, which I thought were somehow dependent on your experimental design, but it seems I was mistaken.

      David

      Comment

      • dpryan
        Devon Ryan
        • Jul 2011
        • 3478

        #4
        Correct, normalization factors are independent from experimental design.

        Comment

        • David [R]
          Member
          • Jul 2012
          • 12

          #5
          Thanks a lot!

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            Today, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            Yesterday, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          7 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          6 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          9 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          31 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...