Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mbirnb
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2012
    • 1

    #1

    Disagreement between bioanalyzer and agarose gel for PCR amplicon library

    Hello,

    We are setting up for an illumina MiSeq run using a PCR amplicon-based library (adding the Illumina adaptors using nested PCR). Our results look quite clean via agarose gel (expected size ~310nt), but when our facility ran bioanalyzer we had quite variable results (ranging between 400 and 500nt, depending on the sample). There are seven samples, each with a different barcode, labeled 1-7.

    I'm attaching both the gel and the bioanalyzer report - has anyone seen anything like this before?

    Thanks,
    Michael
    Attached Files
  • pmiguel
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 2328

    #2
    I can only speculate. Maybe the agarose gel was run either without EtBr, then post run stained, or no EtBr was put in the gel or loading solution, but was put in the buffer? In either of these cases, the products would migrate mostly or entirely in the absence of EtBr.

    Why is that important? Well, I have not tested this myself, but Dave Cook at Sage Science told me that in the absence of EtBr (or other DNA binding dyes) the difference in mobility between fully double-stranded amplicons, and "bubble products" (double stranded only at the adapter ends) does not happen. I.e. everything basically runs at the "correct" size.

    So, if this is the issue you see, your amplicons are fine, but consist of variable amounts of normal and bubble-products. The Bioanalyzer chip faithfully displays the difference with the bubble products migrating slower than their true molecular weight.

    Again, just a guess.

    --
    Phillip

    Comment

    • DNA_Dan
      Member
      • Nov 2008
      • 21

      #3
      Make sure you aren't overloading the chip. The first 3-5 samples look really hot relative to the standard. You could also try a DNA1000 chip since your products are so small.

      Comment

      • tomhooven
        Junior Member
        • Jul 2015
        • 1

        #4
        Hi Michael--
        I was curious how this worked out for you. I recently prepared an amplicon library for TnSeq and had a similar discrepancy between my gel (the expected 190-bp band) and my bioanalyzer results (around 220 bp). I couldn't figure out why this happened.
        -Tom

        Comment

        • DNA_Dan
          Member
          • Nov 2008
          • 21

          #5
          I think this has to do with the mobility of the y-forked adapters. Agarose is more difficult for migration because it's a solid phase, whereas the Bioanalyzer chip's gel matrix is much more fluid. I think the DNA 7500 chip gives the best representation of the "real" size.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
            by SEQadmin2



            CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

            Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
            ...
            07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
            by SEQadmin2


            Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

            The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
            ...
            07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
          0 responses
          35 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
          0 responses
          25 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...