Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fanli
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2014
    • 197

    #16
    I think low diversity would only cause jaggedness in the intensity profile, but maybe you should check w/ tech support.

    Our 16S runs have 1st cycle intensities ~150.
    Attached Files

    Comment

    • RickC7
      Member
      • Feb 2010
      • 31

      #17
      strange

      hi fanli,

      hmmm, the run summary you posted on 5-11-2015 shows read 1 intensity at 17 and read 4 intensity at 53. The other run summary from the OP also shows low intensity 1st cycle. This also fits with what I see in 16s libraries on miseq. So, 3 different machines, 3 different places, 3 similarly low 1st cycle intensities...
      Tech support is telling me this is the reason I am having issues with run completion. Last 3 runs are terminating randomly, run1- cycle 385, run2-cycle 60, run3 - cycle 587. Tech support has been helpful in replacing kits, but miseq is still out of commission. Have arrange for libraries to be sequenced on another miseq, Qc all checks out so I have little to no concern about the libraries. One comment that came out was " your 1st cycle intensities are very low..." I get a stopped run and funky z-stage errors, z-stage replaced but same issue persists.

      Comment

      • fanli
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2014
        • 197

        #18
        My bad - that last screenshot is Called Int. Yeah, you're right - the Cycle 1 intensities for my last run are 30 and 39 for read 1 and read 3, respectively.

        We haven't had any issues with runs terminating randomly for 16S libraries though. Although now that I think about it, we did have one bacterial WGS run that died on cycle 515 or so. Something about a .NET framework error and tech support said they hadn't seen it before.

        Comment

        • BioGenomics
          Member
          • Apr 2009
          • 25

          #19
          Hi all,

          what is the minimum Q-value you would suggest for a 16s read/merged amplicon Trimming/clipping ?

          thanks

          Comment

          • thermophile
            Senior Member
            • Apr 2015
            • 243

            #20
            I don't trim based on qscore, I use the qscores to merge reads. I use mothur which impliments pandaseq for it's read merging
            Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:26 AM
            0 responses
            13 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
            0 responses
            26 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            16 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            33 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...