Originally posted by super0925
View Post
Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
X
-
Sorry D, I didn't totally get what you said.Originally posted by dpryan View PostGTF files match the "top assembly", rather than the "primary assembly". Either download the matching fasta file or remove the haplotype patches from your GTF.
The genes.gtf and genome.fa are downloaded from the latest UCSC homo sapiens hg19 genome.
How could I 'download the matching fasta' or 'remove the haplotype patches' to use your script?
Thank you!
PS: I only change your script to
GTF <- import.gff(GTFfile, format="gtf", genome="hg19", asRangedData=F, feature.type="exon")
grl <- reduce(split(GTF, elementMetadata(GTF)$gene_id))
reducedGTF <- unlist(grl, use.names=T)
Comment
-
-
If you just need the lengths then remove the code that calculates GC content. Something like the following should work:
Code:#!/usr/bin/Rscript library(GenomicRanges) library(rtracklayer) library(Rsamtools) GTFfile = "something.GTF" #Load the annotation and reduce it GTF <- import.gff(GTFfile, format="gtf", genome="GRCm38.71", asRangedData=F, feature.type="exon") grl <- reduce(split(GTF, elementMetadata(GTF)$gene_id)) reducedGTF <- unlist(grl, use.names=T) elementMetadata(reducedGTF)$gene_id <- rep(names(grl), elementLengths(grl)) elementMetadata(reducedGTF)$widths <- width(reducedGTF) #Create a list of the ensembl_id/GC calc_GC_length <- function(x) { sum(elementMetadata(x)$widths) } output <- sapply(split(reducedGTF, elementMetadata(reducedGTF)$gene_id), calc_GC_length)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by dpryan View PostIf you just need the lengths then remove the code that calculates GC content. Something like the following should work:
Code:#!/usr/bin/Rscript library(GenomicRanges) library(rtracklayer) library(Rsamtools) GTFfile = "something.GTF" #Load the annotation and reduce it GTF <- import.gff(GTFfile, format="gtf", genome="GRCm38.71", asRangedData=F, feature.type="exon") grl <- reduce(split(GTF, elementMetadata(GTF)$gene_id)) reducedGTF <- unlist(grl, use.names=T) elementMetadata(reducedGTF)$gene_id <- rep(names(grl), elementLengths(grl)) elementMetadata(reducedGTF)$widths <- width(reducedGTF) #Create a list of the ensembl_id/GC calc_GC_length <- function(x) { sum(elementMetadata(x)$widths) } output <- sapply(split(reducedGTF, elementMetadata(reducedGTF)$gene_id), calc_GC_length)
Hi D
Brilliant! It works.
I have just changed one command
GTF <- import.gff(GTFfile, format="gtf", genome="hg19", asRangedData=F, feature.type="exon")
However, the result only contain 25369 genes.
However, there are 23170 rows in the count table generated by HTseq, which means there are 23170 genes in the human genome.
Why does the dimension are different? I don't think rpkm() could go further if the dimension are different...
Thank you!
Comment
-
-
There are some entries that htseq-count will skip (those without exons?), which presumably is why this happens. Anyway, you need to ensure that everything is in the same order anyway, so make sure to write meaningful row names and use those with match().
Comment
-
-
Thank you D. Very helpful.Originally posted by dpryan View PostThere are some entries that htseq-count will skip (those without exons?), which presumably is why this happens. Anyway, you need to ensure that everything is in the same order anyway, so make sure to write meaningful row names and use those with match().
And I also found Cufflinks could calculate RPKM directly.
by
cufflinks -o OutDir -g hg19/genes.gtf TopHat/accepted_hits.bam
Comment
-
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by SEQadmin2
Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
...-
Channel: Articles
07-09-2026, 11:10 AM -
-
by SEQadmin2
Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.
There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...-
Channel: Articles
07-08-2026, 05:17 AM -
-
by GATTACATLove this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
-
Channel: Articles
07-01-2026, 11:43 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
|
0 responses
24 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
|
0 responses
33 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
|
0 responses
21 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
|
0 responses
34 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
|
Comment