Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • urchin
    Member
    • Sep 2015
    • 20

    Just starting a large project in a new lab - unsure of equipment needs

    We are starting up a project and plan to use MiSeq for analysis later. I am purchasing some new equipment and can't find any specifics on why it might be better to get a PCR workstation with laminar flow rather than dead air!! We have a regular fume hood in the lab already. I just want to decrease possible contamination for PCR prep and planned to get a UV PCR workstation, not realizing this was a possible issue. In the past I have only done projects with low risk of contamination, but now will be using universal primers.

    Please help me with pros and cons of each type if you have done these type of projects before.
  • urchin
    Member
    • Sep 2015
    • 20

    #2
    OK, thanks to the people who looked at my question. Does a failure to answer mean this is just too stupid a question, or that is just doesn't matter, or that nobody has an opinion?

    Comment

    • westerman
      Rick Westerman
      • Jun 2008
      • 1104

      #3
      I suspect that only a handful people on SeqAnswers are qualified to answer your rather specific question. I am not one of those people. Of those people who could answer your question they may either (a) not logging on very often, (b) not reading the 'general' forum (posting in Illumina/Solexa might be better) and/or (c) skipping your post because it has too general of a title. I suggest reposting with the title along the lines of "Need advice on PCR workstation - laminar flow or not?" That should catch the eye of people who know about PCR workstations.

      Comment

      • urchin
        Member
        • Sep 2015
        • 20

        #4
        Thanks Westerman

        I appreciate the advice and I'll try that.

        Comment

        • ECO
          --Site Admin--
          • Oct 2007
          • 1360

          #5
          What is your application and why do you think you need a PCR hood? Rare variant detection?

          Comment

          • urchin
            Member
            • Sep 2015
            • 20

            #6
            Hi Eco,
            No we aren't looking for rare variants. Another person on campus who is doing NGS just told us we should probably get a PCR workstation and since we are clueless about NGS we said OK and their hood includes laminar flow. We are using our current hood for some preps involving solvents and tissues that could present a problem - and we only have one hood. So it does seem useful to have a "special clean area" for preps but as I said, I'm not sure we need the $5000 version with laminar flow. We are grateful for any suggestions from people who already know how careful we really need to be.

            Comment

            • luc
              Senior Member
              • Dec 2010
              • 469

              #7
              A lab bench seems good enough for your purpose - and good technique. A fume hood (you mentioned solvents) is counter productive.

              Comment

              • NextGenSeq
                Senior Member
                • Apr 2009
                • 482

                #8
                I think a PCR work station is a good idea. We have a separate clean room where we work only with unamplified DNA or RNA. I would get a work station with a UV light. It doesn't have to have laminar flow.

                Clean rooms have positive air flow (the pressure is higher in it than outside).

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • GATTACAT
                  Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by GATTACAT
                  Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                  07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by SEQadmin2


                  I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                  Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                  06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
                0 responses
                7 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
                0 responses
                11 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                0 responses
                19 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                0 responses
                53 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...