Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sacketlc
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2015
    • 1

    Strange Fst distribution in BayeScan

    I have used BayeScan (2.1) successfully several times on various subsets of a large SNP dataset that I am currently working on. Recently, I tried to use it to infer outliers between several population pairs using my whole dataset (57,000 SNPs), and came up with a peculiar result in all 9 population pairs. The plot of posterior density for Fst looks as expected, except with a mean Fst ~ 0.4 - 0.6, depending on the population pair (not ~0.05 as I know them to be). If I plot a frequency distribution of Fst values inferred by BayeScan, the distribution is the opposite of what I would expect -- the highest frequency is Fst at these high values around 0.5, with a tail on the left for low Fst values. These are bird populations that we know are differentiated but still experience some gene flow, and are geographically quite close. Calculating Fst in vcftools or Genepop gives a mean and distribution more in line with expectations -- mean ~0.05 with a tail to the right of higher Fst values.

    Has anyone else experienced something similar? I have been picking my brain to try to figure out what is causing this to happen, but don't have any hypotheses yet. The current dataset has less missing data than subsets I have previously used, so I wouldn't expect that to be an explanation, and I used the same approach as previously. I used PGDSpider to convert from vcf format to BayeScan format.

    I would appreciate any thoughts!
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    For reference

    cross-posted on Biostars: https://www.biostars.org/p/160738/

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    23 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    23 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    22 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    55 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...