Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • yerbol
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 7

    [DEXSeq] exon counts to "PSI" (exon inclusion level)

    Hello all,

    I`m using DEXSeq to find differential splicing. It operates with raw counts of reads aligned to the exonic segments. But frequently it is worth to have inclusion levels ("PSI") assigned to exons, which is proportion of transcripts including given exonic segment among all transcripts of given gene.

    Calculation of absolute expression level of exon is seems to be not very difficult (something like FPKM): exon count * size factor (or divided to the size of library) / length of exon.

    But for inclusion level we need to find ratio of expression level of exon (FPKM/counts normalized to length) to the expression level of whole gene:
    something like "PSI" = "exonFpkm"/"geneFpkm".

    Is there any smart way to calculate something like PSI from exon count objects used in DEXSeq?

    Thank you.
  • DerSeb
    Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 44

    #2
    Hi yerbol,

    we have done just that:



    There is also a script available that will calculate the PSI scores as explained in the protocol for you. You can either use count files or read files as input.

    All the best,
    Sebastian

    Comment

    • Neuromancer
      Member
      • Aug 2011
      • 28

      #3
      Hi Sebastian, any chance you could provide fulltext to the article you linked? Can't get it though my university....

      Thanks,

      Roman

      Comment

      • DerSeb
        Member
        • Oct 2009
        • 44

        #4
        Dear Roman,

        feel free to contact me at:

        sebastian.schaefer and at the domain nhcs.com.sg

        Thanks for your interest in our work,
        Sebastian

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        22 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        22 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        55 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...