Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • C9r1y
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2013
    • 8

    Illumina reads failing to map to bacterial genome with Tophat

    Hello,

    I am working with fastq files generated from an Illumina HISeq 2000. They are 50bp paired end reads. I am trying to align these files to the Shewanella genome and my results have been discouraging. When I view my accepted_hits.bam files generated from Tophat in the IGV, I see that the coverage is sparse and the reads that are present are not mapping to genes. My tophat command is as follows:

    tophat -p 8 -G Shewanella_MR1.gtf -o <outputfile> Shewanella_index Sample1_1.fq Sample1_2.fq

    Does anyone know of any parameters that I may be missing that could affect the stringency of the alignment? Thanks for any insight. I have attached a screen shot of the alignment files in the IGV.
    Attached Files
  • swbarnes2
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 910

    #2
    Why are you using tophat? Just use Bowtie? Tophat is for aligning transcript reads to a genome. It's purpose is to align reads which are split across exomes. That doesn't happen with bacteria, or with a DNA prep.

    Comment

    • capricy
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2012
      • 125

      #3
      well, if tophat doesn't do, do you expect bowtie to be better? tophat is based on bowtie...

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      14 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...