Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ArtemLada
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 3

    Lost pairing info after bwa mem

    Dear all,

    Seems I'm missing something trivial, but cant figure out.

    I've got exome seq pipeline. 2 fastq files with corresponding paired reads. Both fastq files contain 92110130 reads each. I am aligning to hg19 as follows:

    bwa mem hg19.fa -t 8 -I R1_001.fastq.gz R2_001.fastq.gz > alignment.sam

    Then converting to BAM:

    samtools view -bS alignment.sam > alignment.bam

    Then checking the statistics:

    samtools flagstat alignment.bam

    Output of last command is:

    92171082 + 0 in total (QC-passed reads + QC-failed reads)
    0 + 0 duplicates
    91296311 + 0 mapped (99.05%:-nan%)
    0 + 0 paired in sequencing
    0 + 0 read1
    0 + 0 read2
    0 + 0 properly paired (-nan%:-nan%)
    0 + 0 with itself and mate mapped
    0 + 0 singletons (-nan%:-nan%)
    0 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr
    0 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr (mapQ>=5)

    Question: where did all pairing info go?
    Last edited by ArtemLada; 01-10-2016, 01:51 AM.
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    Try:
    Code:
     bwa mem -t 8 hg19.fa R1_001.fastq.gz R2_001.fastq.gz > alignment.sam
    I imagine that the non-existent "-I" option mucked things up.

    Comment

    • ArtemLada
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2010
      • 3

      #3
      Originally posted by dpryan View Post
      Try:
      Code:
       bwa mem -t 8 hg19.fa R1_001.fastq.gz R2_001.fastq.gz > alignment.sam
      I imagine that the non-existent "-I" option mucked things up.
      Hey thanks dude! It solved this... Dont know why there was this "-I", probably from obsolete pipeline I was using for older bwa version. Anyway, it worked, fresh look helps a lot!

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
        by SEQadmin2


        Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


        The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
        ...
        06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      6 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      16 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      51 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
      0 responses
      110 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...