Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • skbrimer
    Member
    • Mar 2014
    • 55

    Split N Trim RNAseq data

    Hello everyone,

    I have more of a general pre-processing question. We are doing some small viral genome sequencing. The virus is ssRNA (coronaviridae) and we have been using the RNAseq method on the PGM and I was just wondering if I'm doing the pre-processing correctly.

    I have been treating the reads like genomic DNA for the processing, which is just mapping to the reference and marking duplicates. Is this correct? Should I be looking for splits? I know that viruses have different splices to make early and late proteins, but not really these two genes make one protein splices.

    The more I thought about it the more unsure I became, does anyone have an opinion?
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    It seems prudent to map with a splice-aware aligner, just to be on the safe side.

    Comment

    • SylvainL
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2012
      • 180

      #3
      Hi,

      simply tell us with mapper you used. If you used bowtie2 it should be fine...

      Comment

      • skbrimer
        Member
        • Mar 2014
        • 55

        #4
        Hi everyone! Thank you for the input, I am using TMAP(modified BWA) and BWA. So I have not used bowtie 2 before but it is a splice aware mapper correct? So I have 2 votes for using a splice aware vs a non-splice aware. Correct?

        Comment

        • GenoMax
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2008
          • 7142

          #5
          Add BBMap to the list if you are looking at alternates.

          Comment

          • Brian Bushnell
            Super Moderator
            • Jan 2014
            • 2709

            #6
            Originally posted by skbrimer View Post
            Hi everyone! Thank you for the input, I am using TMAP(modified BWA) and BWA. So I have not used bowtie 2 before but it is a splice aware mapper correct? So I have 2 votes for using a splice aware vs a non-splice aware. Correct?
            No, Bowtie2 is not splice-aware.

            Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
            Add BBMap to the list if you are looking at alternates.
            +1

            Comment

            • SylvainL
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2012
              • 180

              #7
              Yep, actually my mistake. I wanted to mention STAR (based on Bowtie2) which is splice-aware...
              You can also use TopHat but, to my knowledge, bwa is not splice-aware...

              Comment

              • westerman
                Rick Westerman
                • Jun 2008
                • 1104

                #8
                Originally posted by SylvainL View Post
                ... You can also use TopHat but, to my knowledge, bwa is not splice-aware...
                What do those two sentence parts have to do with each other? Tophat is splice-aware and uses bowtie2 as its mapping engine.

                Comment

                • SylvainL
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2012
                  • 180

                  #9
                  skbrimer mentioned he used bwa, which is not splice aware. And I spoke about TopHat (and STAR in a previous answer) which are both splice-aware... I did not mean that TopHat was based on bwa...

                  Comment

                  Latest Articles

                  Collapse

                  • GATTACAT
                    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                    by GATTACAT
                    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
                  • SEQadmin2
                    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                    by SEQadmin2


                    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

                  ad_right_rmr

                  Collapse

                  News

                  Collapse

                  Topics Statistics Last Post
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
                  0 responses
                  16 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
                  0 responses
                  17 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                  0 responses
                  21 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                  0 responses
                  54 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Working...