Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • skbrimer
    Member
    • Mar 2014
    • 55

    #1

    Split N Trim RNAseq data

    Hello everyone,

    I have more of a general pre-processing question. We are doing some small viral genome sequencing. The virus is ssRNA (coronaviridae) and we have been using the RNAseq method on the PGM and I was just wondering if I'm doing the pre-processing correctly.

    I have been treating the reads like genomic DNA for the processing, which is just mapping to the reference and marking duplicates. Is this correct? Should I be looking for splits? I know that viruses have different splices to make early and late proteins, but not really these two genes make one protein splices.

    The more I thought about it the more unsure I became, does anyone have an opinion?
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    It seems prudent to map with a splice-aware aligner, just to be on the safe side.

    Comment

    • SylvainL
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2012
      • 180

      #3
      Hi,

      simply tell us with mapper you used. If you used bowtie2 it should be fine...

      Comment

      • skbrimer
        Member
        • Mar 2014
        • 55

        #4
        Hi everyone! Thank you for the input, I am using TMAP(modified BWA) and BWA. So I have not used bowtie 2 before but it is a splice aware mapper correct? So I have 2 votes for using a splice aware vs a non-splice aware. Correct?

        Comment

        • GenoMax
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2008
          • 7142

          #5
          Add BBMap to the list if you are looking at alternates.

          Comment

          • Brian Bushnell
            Super Moderator
            • Jan 2014
            • 2709

            #6
            Originally posted by skbrimer View Post
            Hi everyone! Thank you for the input, I am using TMAP(modified BWA) and BWA. So I have not used bowtie 2 before but it is a splice aware mapper correct? So I have 2 votes for using a splice aware vs a non-splice aware. Correct?
            No, Bowtie2 is not splice-aware.

            Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
            Add BBMap to the list if you are looking at alternates.
            +1

            Comment

            • SylvainL
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2012
              • 180

              #7
              Yep, actually my mistake. I wanted to mention STAR (based on Bowtie2) which is splice-aware...
              You can also use TopHat but, to my knowledge, bwa is not splice-aware...

              Comment

              • westerman
                Rick Westerman
                • Jun 2008
                • 1104

                #8
                Originally posted by SylvainL View Post
                ... You can also use TopHat but, to my knowledge, bwa is not splice-aware...
                What do those two sentence parts have to do with each other? Tophat is splice-aware and uses bowtie2 as its mapping engine.

                Comment

                • SylvainL
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2012
                  • 180

                  #9
                  skbrimer mentioned he used bwa, which is not splice aware. And I spoke about TopHat (and STAR in a previous answer) which are both splice-aware... I did not mean that TopHat was based on bwa...

                  Comment

                  Latest Articles

                  Collapse

                  • SEQadmin2
                    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                    by SEQadmin2




                    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
                    Yesterday, 06:46 AM
                  • SEQadmin2
                    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                    by SEQadmin2



                    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                    ...
                    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

                  ad_right_rmr

                  Collapse

                  News

                  Collapse

                  Topics Statistics Last Post
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
                  0 responses
                  26 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
                  0 responses
                  16 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
                  0 responses
                  71 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
                  0 responses
                  48 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Working...