Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • g781
    Member
    • May 2010
    • 25

    problem withe Illumina solexa sequencing

    hi all,

    I have a dataset with 4 columns, inculde chromosome, position, read count and direction (F/R), extracted from original Illumina solexa sequencing dataset, but the dataset have highly redanduncy. The dataset is about ~130Mb. However, the dataset reduced to ~30M dramatically when I removed the redanduncy datas.

    Whether the original dataset is wrong or nothing?
  • NextGenSeq
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 482

    #2
    You want high coverage (which is what I think you mean by redundancy). Typically people shoot for at least 20x coverage for SNP and indel detection.

    Comment

    • g781
      Member
      • May 2010
      • 25

      #3
      The dataset is used to map the distrubution of nucleosomes in yeast genome. could I ask you whether the highly coverage dataset is able to map nucleosome distrubution.

      I have used a template filtering program, published from Genome Res. 2010 Jan;20(1):90-100, to map the distrubution of nucleosomes. My condition is normal as wild-type, so typically the result should be the same with figrue 3D (yellow). However, the result is different the figure 3D (see yellow). Therefor, I doubt whether the highly coverage dataset is the cause of making results inconsistent.

      My result is following:
      Last edited by g781; 05-13-2010, 10:20 AM.

      Comment

      • Nik
        Member
        • May 2009
        • 14

        #4
        I'm not sure what you really mean but I've had something similar and this was due to duplications.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        21 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        22 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        21 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...