Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • luc
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 469

    #31
    But counting applications are much better served by the HiSeq - if one does not need immediate turnaround.


    Originally posted by M4TTN View Post
    Info from Illumina:

    The MiniSeq is similar to the technology utilised with our NextSeq platform based on 2-channel SBS chemistry.

    Pricing Information

    MiniSeq System (SY-420-1001): £35,653
    MiniSeq Basic Plan (20004132): £3,350 for 1 additional year’s cover
    MiniSeq Comprehensive Plan (20004133): £4,021 for 1 additional year’s cover

    Code:
    High Output Kit 	2 x 150 (300bp)	7.5	25	FC-420-1003	1,046
    High Output Kit 	2 x 75 (150 bp)	3.75	25	FC-420-1002	652
    High Output Kit 	1 x 75 (75 bp)	1.875	25	FC-420-1001	558
    Mid  Output Kit	2 x 150 (300 bp)	2.4	8	FC-420-1004	384
    So upfront and service costs are half a MiSeq.
    Output for counting experiments is the same as MiSeq v3 chemistry (25 M reads)
    The only thing it lacks are long paired reads 2x300 bp (but those kits are failing at the moment anyway...) and with NexteraXT many of our fragments are shorter than 300 bp anyway...

    I think knowing what I know now...I'd probably buy one...specs are only going to improve.

    Comment

    • M4TTN
      Member
      • Jan 2014
      • 77

      #32
      Depends on how many reads you need...we are multiplexing 5-8 samples quite nicely on a MiSeq (counting expt). No need to go to higher depth for us (at least not at the moment).

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      55 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...