Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bunce
    Member
    • Sep 2012
    • 55

    #16
    This is an interesting thread - we also had a drop in MiSeq performance (in low complexity libraries) after upgrading to 2.6 and like some of you rolled back to 2.5. I was told there was nothing in the upgrade that might cause this but our runs turned to custard about the time we upgraded. I am staying put in 2.5 for as long as possible.

    Comment

    • Number6
      Member
      • Feb 2009
      • 19

      #17
      Hi GenoMax, not in so many words, but they had reports of poor performance and the primary improvements in MCS 2.6 were for the Trusight Tumor 15 workflow, so rolling back was suggested if we weren't running that.

      Comment

      • WhatsOEver
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2012
        • 215

        #18
        Just in case you haven't seen it: The 2.6 version is currently not available due to a "review"

        The recently-released MiSeq Updater v2.6.1.4 has been temporarily removed from our website for review. We will update customers as information becomes available.
        From: https://support.illumina.com/downloa...s_updater.html

        Comment

        • thermophile
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2015
          • 243

          #19
          Well it's clearly library specific, though I can't figure out how. I had a successful run last week 75% 7pM 16s amplicons, 20% 8pM truseq genome, 5% phiX. Tried running the problem library again-60% 6pM 16s amplicon, 10% ITS amplicon, 15% 8pM nextera genome, 15% phiX. Again the first read and the indices look great (700k, 86%PF, 16% aligned to phiX). Second read is horrible and only 3% aligned to phiX. This run is higher diversity (though still very low diversity by general Illumina guidelines) and lower clustering than the last successful run.
          Last edited by thermophile; 02-10-2016, 02:19 PM.
          Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

          Comment

          • thermophile
            Senior Member
            • Apr 2015
            • 243

            #20
            This run finally worked on a different machine. FAE is coming out next week to check the temps on both machines and to adjust my machine to match the one that worked.
            Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

            Comment

            • GenoMax
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2008
              • 7142

              #21
              @Number6: We finally hit the "lost focus" error late in cycle on one of runs and were advised by tech support to roll back to MCS v.2.5.x. So far so good.

              Comment

              • thermophile
                Senior Member
                • Apr 2015
                • 243

                #22
                My temp control module is bad!! It would hit a temp but then not hold it. FAE is here replacing it
                Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

                Comment

                • thermophile
                  Senior Member
                  • Apr 2015
                  • 243

                  #23
                  Yet another run failed (after the TCM was replaced). Second level support suggested adding more primers since the TM of the primers (v4 bacteria, aka the ones that most microbiome people use) is low 62-66. This seems to have fixed the issue. I'll see how long this fix lasts
                  Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

                  Comment

                  Latest Articles

                  Collapse

                  • SEQadmin2
                    Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                    by SEQadmin2



                    Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                    ...
                    07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
                  • SEQadmin2
                    Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                    by SEQadmin2



                    Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                    There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                    07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
                  • GATTACAT
                    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                    by GATTACAT
                    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

                  ad_right_rmr

                  Collapse

                  News

                  Collapse

                  Topics Statistics Last Post
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
                  0 responses
                  20 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
                  0 responses
                  31 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
                  0 responses
                  20 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
                  0 responses
                  34 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Working...