Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sajoshi
    Member
    • Dec 2015
    • 26

    #1

    MiSeq v3 PE 300 run and Illumina's service

    MiSeq v3 PE 300 run failed the 3rd time for me. First time Illumina claimed that the software needs downgrading which we did. Second time they said problem is system fluidics, I checked that and it passed. When I loaded sample was at right concentration and the cluster density not overclustered but just right, still the run failed at the same cycle.

    I read people have had problems with this run and it might be due to quality issues of the kit. I am sure Illumina was aware but was claimed there have been no problems for other users with kit which is hard to believe.

    Lately their service has been mediocre, and with the monopoly of their kits on their machines, there is nothing one can do.

    Does anyone have mediocre service with Illumina
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    There is a long thread with various issues for v3 2x300 kits here.

    That said we have not had outright failures with any runs we have done so far. What kind of libraries are you sequencing and how much phiX are you spiking in?

    Comment

    • sajoshi
      Member
      • Dec 2015
      • 26

      #3
      I think the libraries were prepared using Nextera. I did not make them, it was another user running on our machine. The run failed three time at the 300 cycle. I think he spiked 5%. He has had successful runs on MiSeq but using other kits and not this one. Illumina is troubleshooting the issue for me.

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        What was the cluster density for these runs? "Failed at 300 cycles" meaning the run fails as soon as tag read starts?

        With libraries that have had issues it is prudent to deliberately underload by 10% or more. At the end you get less data but a successful run.

        Comment

        • sajoshi
          Member
          • Dec 2015
          • 26

          #5
          Do you mean under load library pool by 10%?

          Comment

          • GenoMax
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2008
            • 7142

            #6
            That is correct (in terms of amount loaded).

            Comment

            • sajoshi
              Member
              • Dec 2015
              • 26

              #7
              It was loaded at 15 pM and the clustering was appropriate. Not over clustered at all. What conc. do you use?

              Comment

              • bilyl
                Member
                • Aug 2013
                • 52

                #8
                Originally posted by sajoshi View Post
                I think the libraries were prepared using Nextera. I did not make them, it was another user running on our machine. The run failed three time at the 300 cycle. I think he spiked 5%. He has had successful runs on MiSeq but using other kits and not this one. Illumina is troubleshooting the issue for me.
                Do you mean it failed at the 300th cycle; eg at the end of one side of a 2x300 run?

                You have to be more aggressive with the tech support if they aren't helpful. Ask for a PhiX run using a 2x300 kit. If that fails then it is definitively the machine's fault.

                If you are using libraries with PhiX spike-in then it could be any number of factors.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                  Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                  ...
                  10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                  by SEQadmin2


                  Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                  We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                  ...
                  09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
                0 responses
                27 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
                0 responses
                20 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
                0 responses
                36 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
                0 responses
                43 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...