Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sebl
    Member
    • Mar 2014
    • 26

    Minimum run output and quality

    Hello,

    I hope this is the right place to ask this.

    I was asked to write the terms for a tender for a NGS service provider for our institute.

    We aim to work mainly with whole genome sequencing/re-sequencing of bacteria and viruses.

    The question is how may I specify the minimum parameters of output and quality below which it would be reasonable to require (demand?) that the service provider perform a run again without charge?

    I mean, what is the minimum % of the expected output for any type of run (say, Illumina) below which a run is considered invalid? Same for average quality? Other parameters that should be included (run parameters)?

    Thank you!
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    Take a look at http://allseq.com/ and https://genohub.com/ to get an idea of what is out there. The guarantee's are going to vary from provider to provider.

    Yields from typical Illumina runs are published in the specs for each instrument (e.g. http://www.illumina.com/systems/hise...fications.html you can search for other sequencers). You need to keep in mind that these specs are for "normal" (uniform A/C/T/G distribution) samples and while they are achievable with regular samples the quality of the libraries has to be excellent to get this sort of output. You have not said if you will be making the libraries or expect the provider to make them. Quality libraries will generate quality output.

    Ultimately the level of service may depend of the volume of samples you have available. Larger volumes will give your more flexibility. But if the volume is low then don't expect a lot of leeway.

    Comment

    • sebl
      Member
      • Mar 2014
      • 26

      #3
      Hi,

      Thanks for the links. From Genohub:

      Unless otherwise specified in the quote, the provider agrees to deliver pass filter reads that are at least 85%.
      So, if I got it right, let's say we are talking about a Miseq run with V2 chemistry. Illumina specs. are
      >75% bases higher than Q30 at 2x250 bp
      . So the sequencer in Genohub would guarantee for minimum 85% or of the 75% expected output?

      Comment

      • sebl
        Member
        • Mar 2014
        • 26

        #4
        Oh, and I mean that lib prep would be included in the service.

        Comment

        • GenoMax
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2008
          • 7142

          #5
          Originally posted by sebl View Post
          Hi,

          So, if I got it right, let's say we are talking about a Miseq run with V2 chemistry. Illumina specs. are . So the sequencer in Genohub would guarantee for minimum 85% or of the 75% expected output?
          Yes. Achievable with normal/good libraries (no low nucleotide diversity).

          Be sure to include sample QC in your request since that will likely be an added cost. It may sometimes be worth paying that upfront since you will know which samples are not worth processing for libraries.

          Comment

          • sebl
            Member
            • Mar 2014
            • 26

            #6
            Good point, thanks!

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            18 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            19 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            21 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            54 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...