Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • soleulloa
    Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 34

    Z Motor: ADC noise which exceeds ADCNoiseErrorLimit

    Hi all,
    Yesterday a run in MiSeq was stopped showing the next message:

    Z Motor: ADC noise is 3592 which exceeds ADCNoiseErrorLimit 3277. numSamples=10x8, avg=31258, posNoise=1906, negNoise=3592

    Density cluster was detected and it was 1266 K/mm2.


    Anyone have seen that error??
    What does ir means?

    Regards!!
    Soledad
  • kmcarr
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 1181

    #2
    Originally posted by soleulloa View Post
    Hi all,
    Yesterday a run in MiSeq was stopped showing the next message:

    Z Motor: ADC noise is 3592 which exceeds ADCNoiseErrorLimit 3277. numSamples=10x8, avg=31258, posNoise=1906, negNoise=3592

    Density cluster was detected and it was 1266 K/mm2.


    Anyone have seen that error??
    What does ir means?

    Regards!!
    Soledad
    This is a hardware error on your MiSeq. You need to contact Illumina Technical Support.

    Comment

    • soleulloa
      Member
      • Aug 2011
      • 34

      #3
      Hi kmcarr,
      Why do you think this is a hardware error? Have you seen it before? ��

      Comment

      • kmcarr
        Senior Member
        • May 2008
        • 1181

        #4
        Originally posted by soleulloa View Post
        Hi kmcarr,
        Why do you think this is a hardware error? Have you seen it before? ��
        Soleulloa,

        It really couldn't be more clear; the error message itself told you that something went wrong with a piece of hardware, the Z motor, on your instrument. If your MiSeq stops mid run and throws up an error message the first thing to do is call Illumina Tech Support. They're the ones that can diagnose and fix the problem.

        Comment

        • soleulloa
          Member
          • Aug 2011
          • 34

          #5
          Pleeeease.. any of you have seen that error before?
          I'm afraid to run again and lose the reagents!

          Comment

          • GenoMax
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2008
            • 7142

            #6
            @soleulloa: Any time there is an error (no matter what kind) you should contact Illumina tech support and have them take a look at the run remotely (as @kmcarr has said before). The error message does sound hardware related so if there is a problem you would not want to run again until the issue is fixed.

            We have seen similar errors before but the problem is the cause can be very specific and can only be diagnosed by Illumina.

            Comment

            • thermophile
              Senior Member
              • Apr 2015
              • 243

              #7
              Don't run it again, call tech support. A field scientist or engineer will come out to check your z motor. They will replace the kit that was wasted by the error as long as you have a service contract.
              Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

              Comment

              • Jessica_L
                Senior Member
                • Feb 2010
                • 117

                #8
                To reiterate what everyone else is saying, you should definitely contact Illumina.

                There is a chance that Z-motor issues can be related to trouble finding the best focal plane for imaging, i.e. something run/sample related rather than hardware, but those error messages usually look a bit different: "Best focus is too near edge of range: Autofocus would have moved Z to NaN, outside soft limits of -0.295001144426642 -0.00489885557335775: Get Move Z Motor To Focus Command", or something to that degree.

                At what point in the run did it run stop? If you got far enough along to actually get cluster counts and the error message showed up mid-run, that's better evidence to support this being a hardware issue, as issues with focusing usually appear in cycle 1.

                Comment

                • soleulloa
                  Member
                  • Aug 2011
                  • 34

                  #9
                  Hi all,

                  I've contacted Illumina support immediatly. They ask for me some archives (sample sheet, runinfo, runparameter and InterOp) and finally the answer was:
                  YOUR SAMPLES ARE VERY CONCENTRATED AND THERE IS A FOCUS PROBLEM BECAUSE DENSITY CLUSTER IS SO HIGH

                  That answer is not satisfactory for me because Density Cluster for this run was 1266 K/mm2 and I've got similar values for other runs and all it is perfect.

                  I think that Illumina is not analyzing the problem in a right way.

                  Comment

                  • thermophile
                    Senior Member
                    • Apr 2015
                    • 243

                    #10
                    call/email your FAS. Most at the general tech support are good but there are a few that aren't.

                    As far as clustering too dense, have you looked at thumbnails for all 4 channels? Do they look overclustered?
                    Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

                    Comment

                    • kmcarr
                      Senior Member
                      • May 2008
                      • 1181

                      #11
                      Originally posted by soleulloa View Post
                      Hi all,

                      I've contacted Illumina support immediatly. They ask for me some archives (sample sheet, runinfo, runparameter and InterOp) and finally the answer was:
                      YOUR SAMPLES ARE VERY CONCENTRATED AND THERE IS A FOCUS PROBLEM BECAUSE DENSITY CLUSTER IS SO HIGH

                      That answer is not satisfactory for me because Density Cluster for this run was 1266 K/mm2 and I've got similar values for other runs and all it is perfect.

                      I think that Illumina is not analyzing the problem in a right way.

                      If a flow cell is over clustered you can not believe the cluster density number which the software states. If the clusters are packed so closely together the image analysis software can't separate them so the cluster density reported is way, way lower than the true number. Illumina's analysis may be entirely reasonable. Can you post some Thumbnails for this run please. Without those we would just be blindly guessing.

                      Comment

                      Latest Articles

                      Collapse

                      • GATTACAT
                        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                        by GATTACAT
                        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
                      • SEQadmin2
                        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                        by SEQadmin2


                        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

                      ad_right_rmr

                      Collapse

                      News

                      Collapse

                      Topics Statistics Last Post
                      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
                      0 responses
                      6 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
                      0 responses
                      11 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                      0 responses
                      19 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                      0 responses
                      53 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Working...