Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • friedrim
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2014
    • 4

    ChIPSeq after FACS

    Dear all,
    I need to perform ChIPSeq on a subpopulation of my neuroblastoma cell line. However, I am worried that the FACS will compromise the integrity of DNA protein interactions. I am going to look at chromatin marks as well as transcription factor myc.
    Does anyone have experience with this topic? What nozzle size and pressure do you use for cell sorting? In our facility, we have an Aria I machine, and I would like to use a 85M nozzle.
    Did anyone try and do the crosslinking before vs after the cell sorting?

    Many thanks for any comments.
    Mona
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    If you don't get any good responses then you might contact Stephan Bonn (though do read through some of his papers to see if the info you need happens to be in there). His group uses FACS sorting of nuclei to purify cell subpopulations from the brain prior to ChIPseq and have had good success. I expect they've done whole cell FACS as well.

    Comment

    • shldbcrzy1
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2016
      • 6

      #3
      Friedrim,

      I am planning to run an expt similar to the one that you described (with specific neuronal population) and will fix samples before FACS. Did you get an answer to your question as to the integrity of the DNA interactions ?

      Comment

      • friedrim
        Junior Member
        • Jun 2014
        • 4

        #4
        Hi, sorry, but I didnt continue this particular experiment since it turned out to be too difficult to collect enough cells for ChipSeq. Good luck for you!

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        55 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...