Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jane M
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 239

    #1

    Allowing a high number of mismatches when mapping

    Dear all,

    I have sequences of 53bp, among which between 23 and 30 bases are of interest (=motifs). For simplicity, I took only the first 17 bases. Each sample has between 5 and 23 millions of reads.
    The reference is composed of 7450 distinct sequences. I took the 17 first bases of the reference sequences for simplicity.
    My goal is to map the motifs to the reference.

    If there was no sequencing error, I would find only 7450 distinct motifs in my samples. There was a problem during the sequencing most likely and 25% of the reads have poor quality.
    When mapping with bowtie
    Code:
    bowtie --best --strata -v 2 -k 1 -m 1 --norc
    the mapping rate is ~ 70-82%.
    I used -v 3 on two samples, and it increases the mapping rate of ~ 1.5% only.

    Since my reference is small (7450 distinct sequences), I know that with less than 17 bases (sometimes 6 bases are sufficient), I can uniquely identify from which of the 7450 references the sequence comes. Thus, I need to allow for this specific case a higher number of mismatches (bowtie is limited to 3).

    I intend to try bowtie2 in local mode. I do not know it, but RMAP (https://omictools.com/rmap-tool) seems to correspond to my question.

    Could you please give me some suggestions/ideas to deal with this particular case?
    Thank you a lot for your help.
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    I suggest you try BBMap, which is quite tolerant of low identity; it typically allows mapping down to around 60-70% identity. For very high sensitivity, try this command:

    Code:
    bbmap.sh in=reads.fq out=mapped.sam vslow minid=0.6 maxindel=5 k=11
    Using only the first 17 bp of sequences will hurt the ability to map with BBMap, though; you need to use the full sequences.

    Comment

    • Jane M
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2011
      • 239

      #3
      Thank you Brian for your suggestion.
      I am doing some tests with Bowtie on shorter sequences and if it doesn't work, I will try BBMap. The maximum length I can use is 23 bp. Would it be sufficient?
      Last edited by Jane M; 07-25-2016, 01:08 AM.

      Comment

      • Brian Bushnell
        Super Moderator
        • Jan 2014
        • 2709

        #4
        23 is fine, but more bases will always increase specificity. If your sequences are 53 bp, why are you cutting them down to 23?

        Comment

        • Jane M
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2011
          • 239

          #5
          Thank you for your answer.

          I am working on a sh screen. The first 22-30 bases are common to all sequences. Between 23 and 31 bases correspond to the sh in each sequence.
          Since there is a problem of quality at the end (from the middle in fact), I use the minimum number of bases (from the left) needed to discriminate the sh.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
          0 responses
          50 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
          0 responses
          37 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
          0 responses
          46 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          46 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...