Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dovah
    Member
    • Jul 2014
    • 18

    ONT MinION mapper benchmarking

    Hi all,

    I have RNA sequencing data (D. melanogaster) from r7 and r9 flowcells. What would be your suggestion for a mapper? I'm mostly interested in benchmarking isoform detection compared to illumina HiSeq2500/PacBio RSII. I'd like to do a benchmarking of the "established" tools (since I realized this knowledge is missing), but you can suggest new ones.

    Thanks in advance for suggestions.
  • gringer
    David Eccles (gringer)
    • May 2011
    • 845

    #2
    bwa in nanopore mode (bwa mem -x ont2d) should be reasonable for mapping. I've had the best results from LAST (particularly for counting subsections of chimeric 2D reads), but it needs a lot of tweaking to get good results.

    Comment

    • dovah
      Member
      • Jul 2014
      • 18

      #3
      Thanks for reply, @gringer. However, may I ask you which criteria you use to say that you got best result from a given mapper? aka, what are the criteria? I can probably imagine you take into account the number of matches/mismatches per read length...but what else? I'd like to build my own benchmark. Thanks

      Comment

      • gringer
        David Eccles (gringer)
        • May 2011
        • 845

        #4
        Eyeballing the results. I guess my criteria for LAST tweaking is something like "length of match at an e-value threshold that looks like it would exclude noisy matches, typically >1000". When comparing different methods, it's the proportion of reads that match to the target reference genome.

        Comment

        • ymc
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2010
          • 496

          #5
          Originally posted by dovah View Post
          Thanks for reply, @gringer. However, may I ask you which criteria you use to say that you got best result from a given mapper? aka, what are the criteria? I can probably imagine you take into account the number of matches/mismatches per read length...but what else? I'd like to build my own benchmark. Thanks
          I think you can download Loman et al's E coli K12 MG1655 data. Supposedly all the reads should come from this genome. So you align the called fastq to the reference and see how well different mapper aligns.

          Comment

          • gringer
            David Eccles (gringer)
            • May 2011
            • 845

            #6
            Most people testing MinION mapping statistics at the moment are only concentrating on the reads that map, and ignoring comparisons with reads that don't map. You can get really good mapping statistics if you're only looking at the best 10% of MinION reads, for example.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:09 AM
            0 responses
            9 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
            0 responses
            17 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
            0 responses
            26 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 11:40 AM
            0 responses
            21 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...