Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • yuehuang
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2013
    • 9

    16S-V4 library peak at smaller bp in bioanalyzer trace

    Dear All,

    I used 16S-V4 kit(BIOO Scientific) to make libraries of DNA extracted from fresh plasma. But the dominant peak is at 350bp, instead of 450bp as suggested by the kit protocol. It's my first time to use this kit. Would anyone kindly help me what this peak could be and what I should do to make it correct?

    BTW: the input DNAs were all below 5ng, so I strictly follow the protocol the manufacturer provided and set the PCR II cycles at 22.

    Thanks much!

    Yue
    Attached Files
  • Bioo Scientific
    Registered Vendor
    • Oct 2009
    • 99

    #2
    Hi Yue,

    We would be happy to help you with this. Can you contact Bioo Scientific’s technical service at [email protected] or 512-707-8993?

    Regards,
    Bioo Scientific

    Comment

    • yuehuang
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2013
      • 9

      #3
      Thanks much!

      I'm discussing this with Brad, your technical support. He's helpful, I believe we will figure this out.


      Originally posted by Bioo Scientific View Post
      Hi Yue,

      We would be happy to help you with this. Can you contact Bioo Scientific’s technical service at [email protected] or 512-707-8993?

      Regards,
      Bioo Scientific

      Comment

      • adam.geber
        Member
        • May 2014
        • 40

        #4
        yuehuang, would you mind sharing your findings here when appropriate? I use a different method to make 16S libraries but have experienced similar sizing discrepancies in the past so I'm interested to know how you and Bioo interpret these results.

        Comment

        • yuehuang
          Junior Member
          • Jan 2013
          • 9

          #5
          Originally posted by adam.geber View Post
          yuehuang, would you mind sharing your findings here when appropriate? I use a different method to make 16S libraries but have experienced similar sizing discrepancies in the past so I'm interested to know how you and Bioo interpret these results.
          Adam, I used to using V1-V3, couldn't get the exactly pure one band peak either, much more impure than the one I showed here. But I used Pippin Prep to pick the correct size libraries, which help us get decent MiSeq data. It's the first time I used V4, I'm following Brad's suggestion to see what's gonna happen. But I'm working on human microbiome, other than gut microbiome, I can't be sure if my samples contain bacteria. Anyway, I will update this thread if those libraries get sequenced.
          Good luck!

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
          0 responses
          20 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          31 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          20 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          34 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...