Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • luxmare
    Member
    • Feb 2009
    • 11

    deletion '*' has quality score in pileup?

    I know that asterisks '*' in read bases column represent deletions as place holders in pileup format. But in my data, deletion '*' seems to has base quality score. why deleted bases have base qualities?

    In this example, there are 6 bases and 1 deletion at the site 25, and the number of base qualities is 7. Can I simply ignore the base quality 'a' corresponding to the deleted base?

    chr1 24 g 7 ,..,-1t.,, ``a]bb\
    chr1 25 t 7 ,..*.,, b[baaa`
    chr1 26 t 7 ,..,.,, a_baa]_

    Thanks in advance.

    FYI:

    I constructed pileup file by using the following command

    $ ./samtools-0.1.7a/samtools pileup -f reference.fa <in.bam> > <out.pileup>
  • epigen
    Senior Member
    • May 2010
    • 101

    #2
    The base quality is also a place holder just as the * in the reads column.

    I found similar occurrences in my data (created with samtools pileup -vcf), e.g.

    chr14 65392038 T A 0 0 0 1 * W

    Note that the weird consensus A must result from a floating underflow in the MAQ SNP calling model (http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawik...?title=SAM_FAQ). Although the FAQ answer says that this only happens in repetitive regions, the reference T is upper case and I just checked again in the UCSC Genome Browser for hg19 that there is no repeat. So I guess the reason is that there is only one read.

    Comment

    • Torst
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2008
      • 275

      #3
      Originally posted by luxmare View Post
      I know that asterisks '*' in read bases column represent deletions as place holders in pileup format. But in my data, deletion '*' seems to has base quality score. why deleted bases have base qualities?
      I don't know how samtools handles this particularly, but the IDEA of giving a deletion a "quality score" is good. A quality score is essentially just a logarithm of a "probability of error" or "probability that this is wrong". So you can interpret it as a statistical confidence of the deletion being real.

      Comment

      • luxmare
        Member
        • Feb 2009
        • 11

        #4
        Hi Torst,
        Thank you for your reply. I agree with you. Quality scores of deletions is informative. But if the pileup format (made by BWA->SAMtools) was designed based on the IDEA you said, inserted bases should have base quality scores. Actually, however, inserted bases don't have qualities as below. I'm confusing...


        chr3 7759 C 4 ..,, SO]^
        chr3 7760 C 4 .+1G.,, \\\[ <-- 4 ref-type bases and 1 insertion, but only 4 qualities
        chr3 7761 G 4 ..,, GT[a

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          Today, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Single-Cell Sequencing at an Inflection Point: Early Impacts of New Platforms and Emerging Trends
          by SEQadmin2


          With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.


          Introduction

          Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...
          05-22-2026, 06:42 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        16 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        37 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
        0 responses
        42 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
        0 responses
        49 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...