Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • buthercup_ch
    Member
    • Apr 2014
    • 41

    #1

    Time Course RNA-Seq

    Hello,

    We just finished the QC for the total reads obtain from a Time Course RNA-Seq experiment (Illumina HiSeq2000), and are satisfied with the quality.
    Now we have started the Differential Expression Gene analysis, and the strategy proposed by our bioinformatican was the following:
    Calculating DEG for every condition compared with the initial one, so we will have at the end 5 comparisons. DEG for each gene will show a certain p-value in each case, so we would count as statistically significant those genes with p-value<0.05 in all 5 comparisons.

    Do you think this is a right approach?

    Thanks in advance for your comments and advices.
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    I hope he/she proposed that as only a quick and easy first go while a more useful analysis was being performed...

    If your goal is to find "all genes that change with time" (this is at least biologically interesting), then tell your bioinformatician to "fit the samples with a model of the form '~time', with 'time' as a factor, and then perform an LRT with '~1' as the reduced model".

    Analysing time-course data is a bit of an art in itself if what I wrote above isn't the question you're interested in answering. At that point, you're best of doing a bit of clustering and trying to determine the proper course of action from how the samples cluster together.

    Comment

    • bastianwur
      Member
      • Feb 2014
      • 98

      #3
      I'd make DE all vs all, then sort out the statistically significant ones (no matter where they are significant) and do clustering on these (as suggested), to see which patterns are in there.

      I don't have any experience with time course data myself, but this is probably what I'm going to do with my current time course (running the clustering on the whole dataset though....right now; might sort the DE ones out afterwards...or maybe I'll change that again the other way round, not sure yet).

      Comment

      • Dario1984
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2011
        • 166

        #4
        You should provide more guidance to the bioinformatician collaborating with you. What is your biological hypothesis? Why did you do the experiment? There must have been particular reasons for choosing the timepoints you chose, which you need to inform the bioinformatician about.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
          by SEQadmin2



          CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

          Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
          ...
          07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
          by SEQadmin2


          Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

          The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
          ...
          07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
        0 responses
        15 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
        0 responses
        32 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
        0 responses
        21 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...