Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Vinz
    Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 80

    Interested in reviewing our manuscript on amplicon sequencing?

    We started HLA genotyping by amplicon sequencing in 2013. 2.7 million samples and several thousand MiSeq/HiSeq runs later, we destilled some quite interesting lessons learned from the data.
    Our manuscript is ready to be reviewed at peerage of science . Since some of the experienced amplicon sequencers post here, I thought I ask for a review here.
    Would be greatly appreciated if you could give it a fair review!
    (2.7 million samples genotyped for HLA by next generation sequencing: Lessons learned)
  • thermophile
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2015
    • 243

    #2
    I'm interested but your link doesn't take me to your paper and I'm not seeing how to search for it.
    Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

    Comment

    • GenoMax
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2008
      • 7142

      #3
      Ditto. There is no way to search by title of the paper (only by author name or so it appears).

      Comment

      • Vinz
        Member
        • Dec 2010
        • 80

        #4
        Sorry, it is our first paper with peerageofscience and I am not yet familiar with the way to refer to manuscripts.
        Keywords are: Next generation sequencing; HLA genotyping; high resolution, high throughput; amplicon PCR; primer dimers; PCR chimerism; novel alleles
        Authors: Schoefl, Quenzel, Lange
        If you can't find it, send me a message with your name (after registering there) and I could suggest you as an reviewer. Thanks!

        Comment

        • Dario1984
          Senior Member
          • Jun 2011
          • 166

          #5
          HLA typing is currently a popular genomics topic. You should submit your work to a traditional journal as soon as possible.

          Comment

          • Vinz
            Member
            • Dec 2010
            • 80

            #6
            Our manuscript got published by BMC genomics. The peerageofscience experience was bumpy as currently there seems not to be a genomics community at peerageofscience. So at the end we went the conventional peer review route.
            If you are doing targeted short amplicon NGS - enjoy the read!

            Comment

            • thermophile
              Senior Member
              • Apr 2015
              • 243

              #7
              fantastic! I've been looking forward to reading this.
              Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

              Comment

              • Dario1984
                Senior Member
                • Jun 2011
                • 166

                #8
                When will the 1919 novel alleles be added to the IMGT/HLA database?

                Comment

                • Vinz
                  Member
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 80

                  #9
                  We are working on this. The current release (3.27) contains 606 of those alleles.
                  However, we are not in favor of submitting partial sequence information for novel alleles. Therefore, we always characterize the full genes from UTR to UTR. This obviously is more challenging, but should be worthwhile. This project is ongoing... A manuscript describing this should be available in the next weeks in the journal HLA.

                  Comment

                  Latest Articles

                  Collapse

                  • GATTACAT
                    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                    by GATTACAT
                    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
                  • SEQadmin2
                    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                    by SEQadmin2


                    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

                  ad_right_rmr

                  Collapse

                  News

                  Collapse

                  Topics Statistics Last Post
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
                  0 responses
                  11 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
                  0 responses
                  14 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                  0 responses
                  20 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                  0 responses
                  54 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Working...