Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • finswimmer
    Member
    • Oct 2016
    • 60

    High percentage of Off-target reads

    Hello,
    we are using TruSight Capture Kits from Illumina for Targeted Sequencing.

    Normally we have around 25% off-target reads within one run. But from time to time there are runs with 75-85% off-target reads resulting in low coverage in the target region.

    What can be the reason for that?

    Our guess is, that it has something to do with the hybridization or the washing step afterwards. Maybe the washing soluting wasn't on room temperature? Maybe the hybridization time was to long (but we never exceeded the 20h recommended in the manual)? If the hybridization time was to long, than in the first or in the second hybridization?

    Have you had similiar problems and found out what the reason was? Any other guess?

    fin swimmer
  • husamia
    Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 66

    #2
    it depends what the rest of 75-85% is. Try to size select before sequencing, this gets ride of small fragments <150 that may be lost due to adapter contamination

    Comment

    • finswimmer
      Member
      • Oct 2016
      • 60

      #3
      Hello husamia,

      we always check the fragment size of our library with a Bioanalyzer. There the library show a normal distribution of the fragment sizes. Also cluster density, cluster passing filter, Q Values, percentage of total aligned reads, the distribution of samples within the library looks fine.

      There are only two values that are abnormal:
      - the mentioned high percentage of off-target reads
      - the concentration of the library after preperation. It's up to 3-4 times higher than normally. That's why we guess it has something to do with the capture or washing step. Either the hybridization probes captured to much or within the washing step to much unspecific region stay in the sample.

      So maybe it's possible to check the concentration with Qubit after washing and if it's to high (but what is "to high"?) we can repeat one more wash?

      fin swimmer
      Last edited by finswimmer; 10-20-2016, 09:16 PM.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      13 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...