Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lugalbanda
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2016
    • 3

    #1

    Limma multifactor experiment design matrix

    Hi, so I am very confused as to how I can make a multifactor design for limma RNA differential expression. I've read other posts in different forums and none of the answers are very explicit (to me) as to how to build a multifactor design

    For examples, say I have p1N, p1T, p2N, and p2T, where p# is patient number and N/T is normal tumor.

    I can build a single factor design matrix like this:

    ------Normal------Tumor
    1 ------ 1 --------- 0
    2 ------ 0 --------- 1
    3 ------ 1 --------- 0
    4 ------ 0 --------- 1

    I am completely lost as to how I can build a numeric matrix with multiple factors, which in this case, the factors would be patient number and N/T.
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    Code:
    d = data.frame(patient=factor(c("p1", "p1", "p2", "p2", ...)),
                   condition=factor(c("N", "T", "N", "T", ...)))
    design = model.matrix(~patient + condition, d)
    N.B., I've likely made a typo somewhere, but that's the gist.

    Comment

    • Lugalbanda
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2016
      • 3

      #3
      Oh, I thought I had to manually build a numeric matrix for the design matrix. Thanks. I have a followup question. I understand that the intercept column that is resulted is used for pair wise comparison. My question is when to use:

      design = model.matrix(~0+patient + condition, d)
      as opposed to this
      design = model.matrix(~patient + condition, d)

      Ok I found this from another post:

      EDIT:
      "This [design = model.matrix(~0+patient + condition, d)] (a cell means model) simply computes the mean expression for each group, and then you have to make all contrasts explicitly. The [design = model.matrix(~patient + condition, d)] has an implicit contrast (everything is a comparison to control), so you have to make contrasts for some comparisons, but not for others."

      from https://support.bioconductor.org/p/57268/


      So is it safe to say this only matters if I am doing a contrast matrix comparison?
      Last edited by Lugalbanda; 10-18-2016, 09:35 AM.

      Comment

      • dpryan
        Devon Ryan
        • Jul 2011
        • 3478

        #4
        Correct, the "0+" is only needed if you want to specify contrasts, which aren't needed to answer your question.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2




          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
          10-30-2026, 06:46 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        33 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
        0 responses
        21 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        71 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        48 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...