Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MatthewHaas
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2012
    • 2

    #16
    Originally posted by chadn737 View Post
    I have used Turbo DNase followed by cleanup on Qiagen columns. The Turbo DNase kit does provide an inactivation agent that is supposed to remove the enzyme, but time and again I find that the inactivation agent fails to adequately remove the enzyme (I have been using it for ~ 5 years now). For more routine uses, I'll use the inactivation agent, but for my more valuable samples, I always follow up with cleanup on a column.
    This thread is rather old, so I'm not sure if I'll be able to get a response, but here goes...

    When you do the column purification to remove the DNase enzyme, do you add buffers (which buffer/what volume?) to your RNA sample before passing it though the column and proceed with the same protocol you used initially to extract the RNA? (With Qiagen Mini kit: RLT, RW1, RPE.) I need to remove some DNA from my RNA samples and I'm a bit concerned that you said the inactivation agent isn't completely removed. I want to make sure the cDNA created from my RNA libraries isn't automatically digested. Thanks for your input.

    Comment

    • DStephens@NuGEN
      Registered Vendor
      • Jun 2016
      • 3

      #17
      Hi MatthewHaas,

      The Qiagen RNAeasy kits include separate protocols for RNA Clean-up after DNase treatment. All you need to do is bring your sample volume up to 100 uL with nuclease-free water, add RLT and EtOH as directed, and add to the column. See p. 54 of the RNeasy Mini Handbook here: https://www.qiagen.com/us/resources/...a33e24&lang=en
      Denise Stephens
      Technical Support Scientist at NuGEN Technologies

      Comment

      • Amar
        Junior Member
        • Nov 2016
        • 2

        #18
        That's really interesting thanks DStephens@NuGEN. I never knew the RNAeasy columns can be used for clean up.

        MatthewHaas: The turbo DNase kit is fantastic and in my experience the inactivation buffer works great. Just be sure to stay well away from the inactivation pellet. I have also been told that DNAse is extremely fragile and sensitive to heat. cDNA synthesis includes a heat-inactivation step, which should hopefully degrade DNAse. But as DStephens@NuGEN said, if the samples are precious then perform a cleanup step.

        Good luck!

        Comment

        • kumard
          Junior Member
          • Jun 2019
          • 6

          #19
          Originally posted by Papaveraceae View Post
          Has anyone used RNAzol, from Molecular Research Center, they make the claim that DNAse is not required after extraction. See the link: http://www.mrcgene.com/rnazol.htm

          Dave
          Its a very old thread, but let me add that I am using RNAZol RT and I see DNA contamination even after following their protocol. I am struggling with this problem. I talked to their tech support and they informed me to do DNAse I treatment. The advantages that RNAZol RT have is that you can use water for the phase separation and the smallRNA fraction profile is better (on small RNA sizing on Agilent bioanalyzer) than Trizol (with RNA of RIN 9). I hope it will help someone.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
          0 responses
          20 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          30 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          20 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          34 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...