Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JBKri
    Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 80

    HiSeq X different insert size?

    I am about to prepare TruSeq PCR-free libraries for HiSeq X sequencing.
    From:


    "The supported insert size on the HiSeq X system is 350 bp and 450 bp for TruSeq Nano DNA and TruSeq DNA PCR-Free libraries."

    As I see it this phrase could be interpreted in two ways; 350 bp for Nano and 450 bp for PCR-free, or both types of libraries can use either insert size. Anyone knows which it is? If the first; does that mean we MUST make our insert size 450 bp? There is not even a protocol for that in the TruSeq manual.

    Jon
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    HiSeq X uses ordered flowcells (like HiSeq 3000/4000). There is a need to control insert size (between 350-450 bp, ideally) with ordered flowcells to avoid generation of optical duplicates due to pad hopping (DNA fragments contaminating multiple wells nearby during the ExAmp procedure).

    While you could load longer libraries, you would need to deal with the optical duplicate issue/loss of data downstream.

    Comment

    • JBKri
      Member
      • Jan 2014
      • 80

      #3
      Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
      HiSeq X uses ordered flowcells (like HiSeq 3000/4000). There is a need to control insert size (between 350-450 bp, ideally) with ordered flowcells to avoid generation of optical duplicates due to pad hopping (DNA fragments contaminating multiple wells nearby during the ExAmp procedure).

      While you could load longer libraries, you would need to deal with the optical duplicate issue/loss of data downstream.
      Thanks. Does this mean we should do a more stringent size selection than the standard TruSeq two-sided magnetic bead size selection? Do you have any links to protocols for this? The Illumina Custom Protocol selector seems to be broken at the moment.

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        I will let someone else answer that since it is about experimental protocol.

        Comment

        • luc
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 469

          #5
          The HiSeq 4000, that we are running, is basically the same sequencer as the X sequencer using the same chemistry. Bead based size selection is perfectly sufficient over here.

          (if anybody has seen any evidence that pad hooping actually occurs more frequently for longer insert libraries I would be interested).
          Last edited by luc; 11-04-2016, 05:29 PM.

          Comment

          • JBKri
            Member
            • Jan 2014
            • 80

            #6
            Originally posted by luc View Post
            The HiSeq 4000, that we are running, is basically the same sequencer as the X sequencer using the same chemistry. Bead based size selection is perfectly sufficient over here.
            ..

            Great, that's just what I was hoping for!

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
            0 responses
            24 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
            0 responses
            34 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            21 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            34 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...