Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ox_zoo
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2016
    • 5

    Low QC scores?

    I have just set up my very first sequencing experiment on the Next-Seq 500. It is now 45 cycles into PE sequencing, however it seems that my QC scores are a bit low. I only have a % >= Q30%: 25.2%

    I have around:
    280 million reads in the QC 10 bin.
    25 million in the QC 20 bin
    8 million in the QC 25 bin
    65 million in QC 30 bin
    44 million in QC 35 bin.

    Is this a bad result? Apologies for my stupidness, just was wondering whether data could be salvaged from this?
  • ox_zoo
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2016
    • 5

    #2
    Yes, now it has finished and the QC is only 15.2.

    The machine also has a warning message on two of the lanes:

    camera disabled:failed to detect clusters


    Does this mean that the cameras are not working properly?

    Thanks

    Comment

    • GenoMax
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2008
      • 7142

      #3
      Probably. You should contact Illumina tech support. They can take a look at your sequencer remotely to diagnose the problem.

      If your instrument is not directly accessible over the network then you will need to send them some diagnostic files.

      Comment

      • ox_zoo
        Junior Member
        • Nov 2016
        • 5

        #4
        Thanks for your reply.

        Yes I will do that - unfortunately since its a weekend they cannot reply.

        I was thinking - if clusters are not formed in those two particular areas, would the cameras be disabled? My pooled library concentration was sufficient, so I did not anticipate any problems. Also, if the cluster density is low then I am not sure how QC would be affected..

        Many thanks
        Last edited by ox_zoo; 11-19-2016, 07:39 AM.

        Comment

        • GenoMax
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2008
          • 7142

          #5
          What was the cluster density for this run?

          If the run was borderline overclustered to begin with, it is possible that sequencer lost the ability to distinguish the clusters over time (they become fatter). There is also the possibility of this being some sort of a hardware issue.

          Comment

          • ox_zoo
            Junior Member
            • Nov 2016
            • 5

            #6
            The cluster density for the four lanes range from 0-250k/mm2.

            The lanes:
            Lane 1: 235 ±41
            Lane 2: 237 ±38
            Lane 3: 212 ±56
            Lane 4: 230 ±35

            I hope this helps.

            Comment

            • GenoMax
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2008
              • 7142

              #7
              This run is borderline overclustered (as I recollect for NextSeq optimal cluster density is 170-220 K cluster/mm^2).

              Since there is nothing to lose at this time contact tech support and see what they say. You may have to eat the cost on this one and re-run.

              Comment

              • bini
                Junior Member
                • Jul 2018
                • 2

                #8
                Hi, How was this error fixed?

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by SEQadmin2


                  I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                  Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                  06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
                  by SEQadmin2


                  Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


                  The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
                  ...
                  06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                0 responses
                34 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
                0 responses
                97 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
                0 responses
                117 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
                0 responses
                112 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...