Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hamcan
    Member
    • Nov 2016
    • 19

    Average Insert Size

    Hi there,
    I ran an Illumina HiSeq run 2x250 and wanted to know how I could find out the average insert size from my fastq files?

    Thanks in advance!
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    There are three primary ways. I'll describe how to do them using the BBMap package.

    1) Via mapping, which requires a reference:
    bbmap.sh in1=r1.fastq in2=r2.fastq ref=ref.fasta ihist=ihist.txt reads=2m pairlen=2000

    2) Via overlap, which requires overlapping reads (they probably overlap given you ran at 2x250):
    bbmerge.sh in1=r1.fastq in2=r2.fastq ihist=ihist.txt reads=2m

    3) Via assembly, which requires sufficient read depth and memory to assemble the genome:
    bbmerge-auto.sh in1=r1.fastq in2=r2.fastq ihist=ihist.txt extend2=200

    2 is the fastest. The best choice and best settings depend on your data, though. Can you describe the organism, experiment, and target insert size?

    Comment

    • hamcan
      Member
      • Nov 2016
      • 19

      #3
      Thanks for responding so quickly!
      Well I ran a HiSeq run on environmental water samples. So it's a metagenomics experiment. The purpose of the experiment is to look at what species are predominant in certain bodies of water. I am looking at bacterial species more specifically.

      I am going to run trimmomatic to trim my reads and remove adapter sequences. Afterwards I am going to use FLASh to merge my reads. In order to find the correct parameters to use for FLASh I need to figure out my average insert size. Hence that is why I am trying to find out how to do that.

      Comment

      • Brian Bushnell
        Super Moderator
        • Jan 2014
        • 2709

        #4
        Full disclosure - I developed BBDuk and BBMerge. In my testing, BBDuk has greater accuracy than Trimmomatic, and BBMerge has greater accuracy than Flash. But you can certainly determine your insert size with BBMerge and then use that with Flash, if you wish. In my experience that's not necessary; Flash will not give substantially better output even when you know the average insert size apriori. Rather, it will output a helpful message when you give it settings it finds inappropriate. You can then correct them, but it will still yield similar results, in my experience.

        Unless you answer all of the questions posed, nobody can give you optimal advice... for example, what's the target insert size?

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
          by SEQadmin2


          Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

          The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
          ...
          Yesterday, 11:48 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        9 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
        0 responses
        30 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        40 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...