Originally posted by westerman
View Post
Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
X
-
Just got 10.3Gbp raw data, histogram suggested 7.0Gbp >Q30 by end of 251|6|251 run. Useable sequence (post-QC trim) checking it on Genomics Workbench probably closer to 9Gbp. About 39.5M reads with average length of 225bp.
Cluster density of 1300K/mm2 - same library gave ~3.5Gbp on a v1 flowcell with 2x151bp reads (clustered at 8pM).Last edited by matth431; 03-05-2013, 04:44 AM.
Comment
-
Hi All,
I am finally running of my bacterial pooled DNA library (which I made using Nextera XT) on the Miseq using MiSeq V3. I have checked the machine now and it shows that after 70 cycles, the >=Q30 is 96%, cluster passing filter 91.4%, and the cluster density is 1092K/mm.
Do you think that the run is going well?
Hope to hear back from you soon again!
Cheers,
Shimul
Comment
-
Sure, those metrics would consistent with the start of a good run.Originally posted by Shimul View PostHi All,
I am finally running of my bacterial pooled DNA library (which I made using Nextera XT) on the Miseq using MiSeq V3. I have checked the machine now and it shows that after 70 cycles, the >=Q30 is 96%, cluster passing filter 91.4%, and the cluster density is 1092K/mm.
Do you think that the run is going well?
Hope to hear back from you soon again!
Cheers,
Shimul
--
Phillip
Comment
-
The Q30 is now 83.1% after 250 cycles, yesterday it was 96% after 70 cycles. But rest of the parameters are consistent: clusters PF 91.4%, cluster density 1092K/mm^2, which are the same as yesterday. Do you speculate anything? DO you think that the run will be okay?Originally posted by pmiguel View PostSure, those metrics would consistent with the start of a good run.
--
Phillip
Many thanks.
Shimul
Comment
-
Sounds like this is your first ever run and you are anxiousOriginally posted by Shimul View PostThe Q30 is now 83.1% after 250 cycles, yesterday it was 96% after 70 cycles. But rest of the parameters are consistent: clusters PF 91.4%, cluster density 1092K/mm^2, which are the same as yesterday. Do you speculate anything? DO you think that the run will be okay?
Many thanks.
Shimul
Cluster density does not change over the run duration. As @nucacidhunter pointed out Q scores may keep dropping. Enjoy the weekend and don't worry about the run.Last edited by GenoMax; 01-09-2017, 08:51 AM.
Comment
-
A correction Geno, %PF does not change. PF clusters are set at cycle 25. Q scores of course are calculsted on each cycle and later cycles always have lower quality than earlier ones.Originally posted by GenoMax View PostSounds like this is your first ever run and you are anxious
Cluster density does not change over the run duration. As @nucacidhunter pointed out the PF% will likely continue dropping as will the Q scores. Enjoy the weekend and don't worry about the run.
Shimul, relax, your run is going fine.
Comment
-
I think it is less accurate quote of my post (#65) from the following:Originally posted by GenoMax View PostSounds like this is your first ever run and you are anxious
Cluster density does not change over the run duration. As @nucacidhunter pointed out the PF% will likely continue dropping as will the Q scores. Enjoy the weekend and don't worry about the run.
http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthr...738#post202738
Comment
-
@nucacidhunter: Please accept my apologies. Thank you @kmcarr also. I should have checked my post more carefully (I have made necessary correction above).Originally posted by nucacidhunter View PostI think it is less accurate quote of my post (#65) from the following:
http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthr...738#post202738
Comment
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by SEQadmin2
CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).
Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into...-
Channel: Articles
07-31-2026, 11:01 AM -
-
by SEQadmin2
Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.
The systematic characterization of the human proteome has...-
Channel: Articles
07-20-2026, 11:48 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:35 AM
|
0 responses
7 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
Today, 10:35 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
|
0 responses
24 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
|
0 responses
41 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
|
0 responses
47 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
|
Comment