Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • morning latte
    Member
    • Jun 2013
    • 91

    MinION sequencing kit

    Hello experts,

    When I am reading some publications using MinION, people used kits named MAP-003 Kits or MAP- 004 Kits for library generation. But when I look at the ONT website, I see three kits, Rapid Sequencing Kit 2, Ligation Sequencing Kit 1D (R9.4), and Ligation Sequencing kit 2D (R9.4)? What are the MAP-003 Kits or MAP- 004 Kits? I am planning to use MinION for viral genomes and not sure which kit I should purchase. Thank you for the help in advance.
  • nanos
    Member
    • May 2010
    • 11

    #2
    The MAP*** kits are outdated versions and are no longer available.
    The selection of kit depends on your sample type:
    RAD - rapid kit tagmenting the template DNA
    Lig1D - Ligation of adaptors sequenicing 1 strand (1D)
    Lig2D - Ligation of adaptor + hairpin adaptor sequencing both strands (2D - results in highter seq-quality)

    The old MAP kits were most likely 2D ligation kits. By know I would guess the 1D sequencing provides same accuracy than the old MAP-2D kits but yield more output.

    Comment

    • morning latte
      Member
      • Jun 2013
      • 91

      #3
      Thanks nanos!

      Comment

      • gringer
        David Eccles (gringer)
        • May 2011
        • 845

        #4
        Originally posted by nanos View Post
        The old MAP kits were most likely 2D ligation kits. By know I would guess the 1D sequencing provides same accuracy than the old MAP-2D kits but yield more output.
        Yes, that's right. To further add to the confusion, ONT will be shortly bringing out a double-1D technology shortly that excludes the hairpin but produces a 2D consensus sequence.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        6 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        19 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        53 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...